ArticleFunctional & integrative genomics2021
RDDSVM: accurate prediction of A-to-I RNA editing sites from sequence using support vector machines.
Article in Functional & integrative genomics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- A token-pruning framework enables efficient representation of the human genome for RNA modification analysis.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Structure-aware graph learning predicts RNA editability across tissues and species.Research square · 2026Article
- ADAR-GPT: Learning the language of the epitranscriptome.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- ADAR-GPT: A continually fine-tuned language model for predicting A-to-I RNA editing sites.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Characterization of Tumor Antigens from Multi-omics Data: Computational Approaches and Resources.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2025Review
- 3'UTR RNA editing driven by ADAR1 modulates MDM2 expression in breast cancer cells.Functional & integrative genomics · 2025Article
- Harnessing ADAR-Mediated Site-Specific RNA Editing in Immune-Related Disease: Prediction and Therapeutic Implications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- ATTIC is an integrated approach for predicting A-to-I RNA editing sites in three species.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Effect of salinity on ccmfn gene RNA editing of mitochondria in wild barley and uncommon types of RNA editing.Functional & integrative genomics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adenosine to inosine (A-to-I) editing in RNA is involved in various biological processes like gene expression, alternative splicing, and mRNA degradation associated with carcinogenesis and various human diseases. Therefore, accurate identification of RNA editing sites in transcriptome is valuable for research and medicine. RNA-seq is very useful for the detection of RNA editing events in condition-specific cells. However, computational analysis methods of RNA-seq data have considerable false-positive risks due to mapping errors. In this study, we developed a simple machine learning method using support vector machines to train sequence and structure information derived from flanking sequences of experimentally verified A-to-I editing sites to predict new A-to-I editing sites in RNA. The highest performance results were obtained by the model that utilizes the composition of the triplet sequence elements in the flanking regions of the in A-to-I editing sites. Using this model, the SVM classifier also showed high performance on experimentally verified data providing a sensitivity of 92.8%, specificity of 77.1%, and accuracy of 90.2%. To compare the predictive capacity of our method with other classifiers that use sequence information, we have used validated human A-to-I RNA editing sites by Sanger sequencing. Out of 58 validated editing sites, our method recognized 53 of them correctly with an accuracy of 91.4% outperforming other classifiers. As to our knowledge, this is the first case of utilization of the composition of the triplet sequence elements neighboring A-to-I editing sites for the prediction of new A-to-I editing sites in RNA. The methodology is very easy to perform and computationally low demanding making it a convenient and valuable choice for facilities with low sources. To facilitate the usage of the method publicly, we developed an open-source program called RDDSVM to perform prediction on candidate A-to-I RNA editing sites using support vector machines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.