ArticleWiener klinische Wochenschrift2022
Underweight but not overweight is associated with excess mortality in septic ICU patients.
Article in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Impact of underweight status on mortality in sepsis patients: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Association of obesity and nutritional status on early sepsis-associated acute kidney injury in older patients with sepsis.BMC nephrology · 2026Article
- Predictors of sepsis, intensive care unit admission, and death in patients hospitalized for complicated skin and soft tissue infections: Retrospective study at a large tertiary-care center.SAGE open medicine · 2025Article
- Bilirubin influences the predictive effect of body mass index on hospital mortality in critically ill patients.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Association of obesity and mortality in sepsis patients: A meta-analysis from observational evidence.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Association of body mass index with mortality of sepsis or septic shock: an updated meta-analysis.Journal of intensive care · 2023Article
- Maternal consumption of a high-fat diet modulates the inflammatory response in their offspring, mediated by the M1 muscarinic receptor.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- Preclinical Mouse Models in Sepsis: Don't Throw the Baby Out with the Bathwater [Response to Letter].Journal of inflammation research · 2023Article
- Mortality risks associated with empirical antibiotic activity in Escherichia coli bacteraemia: an analysis of electronic health records.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2022Article
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHigher survival has been shown for overweight septic patients compared with normal or underweight patients in the past. This study aimed at investigating the management and outcome of septic ICU patients in different body mass index (BMI) categories in a large multicenter database.
methodsIn total, 16,612 patients of the eICU collaborative research database were included. Baseline characteristics and data on organ support were documented. Multilevel logistic regression analysis was performed to fit three sequential regression models for the binary primary outcome (ICU mortality) to evaluate the impact of the BMI categories: underweight (<18.5 kg/m
resultsManagement strategies were similar across BMI categories. Underweight patients evidenced higher rates of ICU mortality. This finding persisted after adjusting in model 2 (aOR 1.54, 95% CI 1.15-2.06; p = 0.004) and model 3 (aOR 1.57, 95%CI 1.16-2.12; p = 0.003). No differences were found regarding ICU mortality between normal and overweight patients (aOR 0.93, 95%CI 0.81-1.06; p = 0.29). Obese patients evidenced a lower risk of ICU mortality compared to normal weight, a finding which persisted across all models (model 2: aOR 0.83, 95%CI 0.69-0.99; p = 0.04; model 3: aOR 0.82, 95%CI 0.68-0.98; p = 0.03). The protective effect of obesity and the negative effect of underweight were significant in individuals > 65 years only.
conclusionIn this cohort, underweight was associated with a worse outcome, whereas obese patients evidenced lower mortality. Our analysis thus supports the thesis of the obesity paradox.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.