ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2022
The impact of PIPs on mortality and readmissions in older adults: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeOur aim was to determine the impact of potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIP), according to "Screening Tool of Older Persons' Prescriptions" criteria version 2 (STOPP-2), on mortality and hospital admissions.
methodsMonocentric retrospective cohort study. Patients over 65 years of age and who were consecutively discharged from internal medicine at a Spanish university hospital in 2016 were included. The mortality and hospital admissions of the cohort of patients were analysed using their electronic health records within two years from the time of discharge. Analysis was done based on the type and number of STOPP-2 criteria as well as taking into account the total number of medications. The subdistribution hazard ratios (SHR) were estimated through a competing proportional hazards model.
resultsA total of 270 patients with a median age of 82 years (interquartile range/IQR 76-86 years), and 152 (56.3%) women were studied. It was found out that 28.3% of patients with PIP died compared to 17.2% of patients without it. Digoxin (B1 STOPP-2 criterion) with a subdistribution hazard ratio (SHR) 2.40 (95% CI 0.63-9.18), selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors/SSRIs (D4) with a SHR 1.76 (95% CI 0.52-5.96) and neuroleptic drugs (K2) with a SHR 2.01 (95% CI 0.82-4.95) non-significantly increased the risk of death. Dementia (SHR 5.45; 95% CI 2.76-10.78) was then the only statistically significant risk factor for death. Sixty percent of patients with a PIP had shown at least one hospital admission compared to 51% of patients without it. The number of drugs at discharge (SHR 1.03; 95% CI 1.01-1.05) and having 1-2 STOPP-2 criteria (SHR 1.17; 95% CI 1.02-1.35) significantly increased the risk of hospital admission.
conclusionThe number of drugs at discharge and having any STOPP criteria significantly increased the risk of hospital admission in this cohort. PIP, only according to some specific STOPP-2 criteria involving digoxin, neuroleptics and SSRIs, might associate with a statistically non-significantly higher risk on mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.