Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34529107›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2021

Effects of luminance contrast, averaged luminance and spatial frequency on vection.

Xuanru Guo, Shinji Nakamura, Yoshitaka Fujii, Takeharu Seno, Stephen Palmisano

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Xuanru GuoFaculty of Design, Kyushu University, Minami-ku, Fukuoka, 815-8540, Japan. guoxuanru1101@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4397-8311
Shinji NakamuraSchool of Psychology, Nihon Fukushi University, Okuda, Mihama-cho, Aichi, 470-3295, Japan.
Yoshitaka FujiiGraduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Kumamoto University, Chuo-ku, Kumamoto, 860-8555, Japan.
Takeharu SenoFaculty of Design, Kyushu University, Minami-ku, Fukuoka, 815-8540, Japan. seno@design.kyushu-u.ac.jp.
Stephen PalmisanoSchool of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia.
Kyushu University · JPKumamoto University · JPNihon Fukushi University · JPUniversity of Wollongong · AU

Funding

japan society for the promotion of science kakenhi 21K03135
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Changing the speed, size and material properties of optic flow can significantly alter the experience of vection (i.e. visually induced illusions of self-motion). Until now, there has not been a systematic investigation of the effects of luminance contrast, averaged luminance and stimulus spatial frequency on vection. This study examined the vection induced by horizontally oriented gratings that continuously drifted downwards at either 20° or 60°/s. Each of the visual motion stimuli tested had one of: (a) six different levels of luminance contrast; (b) four different levels of averaged luminance; and (c) four different spatial frequencies. Our experiments showed that vection could be significantly altered by manipulating each of these visual properties. Vection strength increased with the grating's luminance contrast (in Experiment 1), its averaged luminance (in Experiment 2), and its spatial frequency (in Experiment 3). Importantly, interactions between these three factors were also found for the vection induced in Experiment 4. While simulations showed that these vection results could have been caused by effects on stimulus motion energy, differences in perceived grating visibility, brightness or speed may have also contributed to our findings.

Indexed as

IllusionsMotion PerceptionOptic FlowHumansMotionAveraged luminanceLuminance contrastMotion perceptionSpatial frequencySpeedVection

Identifiers

PMID34529107
OpenAlexW3200548678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.