Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34529086›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2022

Direct discharge of patients with simple stable musculoskeletal injuries as an alternative to routine follow-up: a systematic review of the current literature.

T H Geerdink, J Verbist, J M van Dongen, R Haverlag, R N van Veen, J C Goslings

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Direct discharge of patients with simple stable musculoskeletal injuries as an alternative to routine follow-up: a systematic review of the current literature.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Direct discharge for children with a greenstick or torus fracture of the wrist is a non-inferior satisfactory solution to traditional treatment.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

T H GeerdinkDepartment of Trauma Surgery, OLVG Hospital, Jan Tooropstraat 164, 1061 AE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. t.h.geerdink@olvg.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7618-5425
J VerbistDepartment of Trauma Surgery, OLVG Hospital, Jan Tooropstraat 164, 1061 AE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J M van DongenDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Amsterdam Movement Sciences Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
R HaverlagDepartment of Trauma Surgery, OLVG Hospital, Jan Tooropstraat 164, 1061 AE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
R N van VeenDepartment of Trauma Surgery, OLVG Hospital, Jan Tooropstraat 164, 1061 AE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J C GoslingsDepartment of Trauma Surgery, OLVG Hospital, Jan Tooropstraat 164, 1061 AE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

Achmea WN-2019-060
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThere is growing evidence that patients with certain simple stable musculoskeletal injuries can be discharged directly from the Emergency Department (ED), without compromising patient outcome and experience. This study aims to review the literature on the effects of direct discharge (DD) of simple stable musculoskeletal injuries, regarding healthcare utilization, costs, patient outcome and experience.

methodsA systematic review was performed in Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and Web of Science using PRISMA guidelines. Comparative and non-comparative studies on DD of simple stable musculoskeletal injuries from the ED in an adult/paediatric/mixed population were included if reporting ≥ 1 of: (1) logistic outcomes: DD rate (proportion of patients discharged directly); number of follow-up appointments; DD return rate; (2) costs; (3) patient outcomes/experiences: functional outcome; treatment satisfaction; adverse outcomes; other.

resultsTwenty-six studies were included (92% conducted in the UK). Seven studies (27%) assessed functional outcome, nine (35%) treatment satisfaction, and ten (38%) adverse outcomes. A large proportion of studies defined DD eligibility criteria as injuries being minor/simple/stable, without further detail. ED DD rate was 26.7-59.5%. Mean number of follow-up appointments was 1.00-2.08 pre-DD, vs. 0.00-0.33 post-DD. Return rate was 0.0-19.4%. Costs per patient were reduced by €69-€210 (ranging from - 38.0 to - 96.6%) post-DD. Functional outcome and treatment satisfaction levels were 'equal' or 'better' (comparative studies), and 'high' (non-comparative studies), post-DD. Adverse outcomes were low and comparable.

conclusionsThis systematic review supports the idea that DD of simple stable musculoskeletal injuries from the ED provides an opportunity to reduce healthcare utilization and costs without compromising patient outcomes/experiences. To improve comparability and facilitate implementation/external validation of DD, future studies should provide detailed DD eligibility criteria, and use a standard set of outcomes. Systematic review registration number: 120779, date of first registration: 12/02/2019.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalPatient DischargeAdultChildHumansDirect dischargeFractureFracture managementHealthcare utilizationSystematic reviewValue-based healthcare

Identifiers

PMID34529086
PMCPMC9360121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.