Trial reportJAMA oncology2021
Diagnostic Accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET for Pelvic Nodal Metastasis Detection Prior to Radical Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection: A Multicenter Prospective Phase 3 Imaging Trial.
Trial report in JAMA oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 189 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of Gallium-68 HBED-CC-PSMA Imaging in Prostate Cancer Patients
Gallium-68 PSMA-11 PET in Intermediate to High-risk Preprostatectomy Patients
68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for Staging of Intermediate and High Risk Prostate Cancer Prior to Radical Prostatectomy
A Two Center Phase 2 Trial of 61Cu-noDAGa-PSMA I&T (61Cu-NU101) for Patients With Prostate Cancer
Who cites it
189 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 330 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recommendations from the Galician Oncological Society and the Galician Society of Nuclear Medicine for the use ofClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025Guideline
- The diagnostic accuracy of radiolabeled PSMA-ligand PET for tumour staging in newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients compared to histopathology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023Pooled it
- PSMA PET/CT: joint EANM procedure guideline/SNMMI procedure standard for prostate cancer imaging 2.0.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023Guideline
- Lymph node dissection based on 18F-PSMA PET/CT during radical prostatectomy for intermediate and high risk prostate cancer: interim results of a prospective, randomized study.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2026Trial
- LASER: A Phase 2 Trial ofJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026Trial
- The German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) multi-center prospective phase 1/2European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Trial
- Imaging Efficacy of [Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025Trial
- Comparing Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Positron Emission Tomography for Prediction of Extraprostatic Extension of Prostate Cancer and Surgical Guidance: A Prospective Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.The Journal of urology · 2024Trial
- Interreader and Intrareader Reproducibility ofJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2024Trial
- Trial
- A Phase 2/3 Prospective Multicenter Study of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen PET/CT withThe Journal of urology · 2021Trial
- Pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer: current evidence, controversies, and future directions.Annals of medicine · 2026Review
- Targeted pelvic lymph node dissection using magnetic resonance imaging - ultrasonography fusion technique and indocyanine green injection in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- From reflex to reason: rethinking pelvic lymph node dissection in the PSMA PET Era.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Management of De Novo miN1 Prostate Cancer in the PSMA-PET Era.The Prostate · 2026Review
- Baseline Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT-derived volumetric parameters as predictors of biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2026Article
- Stage migration in prostate cancer: the role of PSMA-PET in identifying oligometastatic disease.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Risk of bone metastases on [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- PSMA PET/CT-guided salvage elective nodal radiotherapy for nodal metastases after radical prostatectomy: a bi-institutional long-term outcome analysis.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Radical prostatectomy without prior biopsy: an initial decision-making algorithm based on PSMA PET/mpMRI.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2026Article
129 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on byBeyond the2022
Authors and funding
24 authors at 13 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
importanceThe presence of pelvic nodal metastases at radical prostatectomy is associated with biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy.
objectiveTo assess the accuracy of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) 68Ga-PSMA-11 positron emission tomographic (PET) imaging for the detection of pelvic nodal metastases compared with histopathology at time of radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsThis investigator-initiated prospective multicenter single-arm open-label phase 3 imaging trial of diagnostic efficacy enrolled 764 patients with intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer considered for prostatectomy at University of California, San Francisco and University of California, Los Angeles from December 2015 to December 2019. Data analysis took place from October 2018 to July 2021.
interventionsImaging scan with 3 to 7 mCi of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was the sensitivity and specificity for the detection pelvic lymph nodes compared with histopathology on a per-patient basis using nodal region correlation. Each scan was read centrally by 3 blinded independent central readers, and a majority rule was used for analysis.
resultsA total of 764 men (median [interquartile range] age, 69 [63-73] years) underwent 1 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET imaging scan for primary staging, and 277 of 764 (36%) subsequently underwent prostatectomy with lymph node dissection (efficacy analysis cohort). Based on pathology reports, 75 of 277 patients (27%) had pelvic nodal metastasis. Results of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET were positive in 40 of 277 (14%), 2 of 277 (1%), and 7 of 277 (3%) of patients for pelvic nodal, extrapelvic nodal, and bone metastatic disease. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for pelvic nodal metastases were 0.40 (95% CI, 0.34-0.46), 0.95 (95% CI, 0.92-0.97), 0.75 (95% CI, 0.70-0.80), and 0.81 (95% CI, 0.76-0.85), respectively. Of the 764 patients, 487 (64%) did not undergo prostatectomy, of which 108 were lost to follow-up. Patients with follow-up instead underwent radiotherapy (262 of 379 [69%]), systemic therapy (82 of 379 [22%]), surveillance (16 of 379 [4%]), or other treatments (19 of 379 [5%]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This phase 3 diagnostic efficacy trial found that in men with intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy and lymph node dissection, the sensitivity and specificity of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET were 0.40 and 0.95, respectively. This academic collaboration is the largest known to date and formed the foundation of a New Drug Application for 68Ga-PSMA-11.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT03368547, NCT02611882, and NCT02919111.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.