Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34529005›Full record

Trial reportJAMA oncology2021

Diagnostic Accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET for Pelvic Nodal Metastasis Detection Prior to Radical Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection: A Multicenter Prospective Phase 3 Imaging Trial.

Thomas A Hope, Matthias Eiber, Wesley R Armstrong, Roxanna Juarez, Vishnu Murthy, Courtney Lawhn-Heath, Spencer C Behr, Li Zhang, Francesco Barbato, Francesco Ceci and 14 more

4 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 189 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
189citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
35.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02611882 phase2completednot on this map

Evaluation of Gallium-68 HBED-CC-PSMA Imaging in Prostate Cancer Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorThomas HopeRan2015 to 2016Enrolled225ConditionsProstate CancerArmsGa-68 labeled HBED-CC PSMA, Positron Emission Tomography (PET) image combined with Computed Tomography (CT) (PET/CT), Positron Emission Tomography (PET) image combined with Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) (PET/MRI)
NCT02919111 phase2 / phase3completednot on this map

Gallium-68 PSMA-11 PET in Intermediate to High-risk Preprostatectomy Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2016 to 2019Enrolled299ConditionsProstate CancerArmsGa-68 labeled PSMA-11 PET
NCT03368547 nacompletednot on this map

68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for Staging of Intermediate and High Risk Prostate Cancer Prior to Radical Prostatectomy

TypeinterventionalSponsorJonsson Comprehensive Cancer CenterRan2016 to 2021Enrolled400ConditionsProstate Adenocarcinoma, Stage IIB Prostate Cancer AJCC v7, Stage III Prostate Cancer AJCC v7, Stage IV Prostate Cancer AJCC v7ArmsComputed Tomography, Gallium Ga 68 Gozetotide, Positron Emission Tomography
NCT07635524 phase2not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

A Two Center Phase 2 Trial of 61Cu-noDAGa-PSMA I&T (61Cu-NU101) for Patients With Prostate Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorHoag Memorial Hospital PresbyterianRan2026 to 2028Enrolled34ConditionsProstate CancerArmsCu-NU101
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

189 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 330 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Recommendations from the Galician Oncological Society and the Galician Society of Nuclear Medicine for the use ofClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. LASER: A Phase 2 Trial ofJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026
    Trial
  6. The German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) multi-center prospective phase 1/2European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Trial
  7. Imaging Efficacy of [Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Interreader and Intrareader Reproducibility ofJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2024
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. From reflex to reason: rethinking pelvic lymph node dissection in the PSMA PET Era.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Stage migration in prostate cancer: the role of PSMA-PET in identifying oligometastatic disease.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  18. Risk of bone metastases on [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

129 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 13 institutions in 4 countries.

Thomas A HopeDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco.
Matthias EiberAhmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles.
Wesley R ArmstrongAhmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles.
Roxanna JuarezDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco.
Vishnu MurthyDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco.
Courtney Lawhn-HeathDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco.
Spencer C BehrDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco.
Li ZhangHelen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco.
Francesco BarbatoTechnical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Munich, Germany.
Francesco CeciDivision of Nuclear Medicine, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Andrea FarolfiDivision of Nuclear Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Sarah M SchwarzenböckDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre, Rostock, Germany.
Marcus UnterrainerDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Helle D ZachoDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Cancer Research Centre, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Hao G NguyenDepartment of Urology, University of California, San Francisco.
Matthew R CooperbergDepartment of Urology, University of California, San Francisco.
Peter R CarrollHelen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco.
Robert E ReiterInstitute of Urologic Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles.
Stuart HoldenInstitute of Urologic Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles.
Ken HerrmannAhmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles.
Shaojun ZhuAhmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles.
Wolfgang P FendlerAhmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles.
Johannes CzerninAhmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles.
Jeremie CalaisAhmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles.
University of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Colorado Cancer Center · USAalborg University Hospital · DKAzienda USL di Bologna · ITDeutschen Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung · DEEuropean Institute of Oncology · ITKlinikum rechts der Isar · DELMU Klinikum · DESan Francisco VA Medical Center · USTechnical University of Munich · DEUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DEUniversity of Rostock · DE

Funding

Women's CancersP30CA016042 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Samuel Wheeler French · 1985 to 2026
$134.5M
UCLA SPORE in Brain CancerP50CA211015 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI David A. Nathanson · 2017 to 2026
$25.2M
MELT: Modulation of PSMA Expression for Lutetium TherapyR01CA235741 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HOPE, THOMAS A · 2019 to 2025
$3.2M
Qualification and Harmonization of PET/MRI for Cancer Clinical TrialsR01CA212148 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HOPE, THOMAS, LAFOREST, RICHARD ANDRE · 2017 to 2022
$2.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016042NCI NIH HHS P50 CA211015NCI NIH HHS R01 CA212148NCI NIH HHS R01 CA235741
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceThe presence of pelvic nodal metastases at radical prostatectomy is associated with biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy.

objectiveTo assess the accuracy of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) 68Ga-PSMA-11 positron emission tomographic (PET) imaging for the detection of pelvic nodal metastases compared with histopathology at time of radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsThis investigator-initiated prospective multicenter single-arm open-label phase 3 imaging trial of diagnostic efficacy enrolled 764 patients with intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer considered for prostatectomy at University of California, San Francisco and University of California, Los Angeles from December 2015 to December 2019. Data analysis took place from October 2018 to July 2021.

interventionsImaging scan with 3 to 7 mCi of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was the sensitivity and specificity for the detection pelvic lymph nodes compared with histopathology on a per-patient basis using nodal region correlation. Each scan was read centrally by 3 blinded independent central readers, and a majority rule was used for analysis.

resultsA total of 764 men (median [interquartile range] age, 69 [63-73] years) underwent 1 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET imaging scan for primary staging, and 277 of 764 (36%) subsequently underwent prostatectomy with lymph node dissection (efficacy analysis cohort). Based on pathology reports, 75 of 277 patients (27%) had pelvic nodal metastasis. Results of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET were positive in 40 of 277 (14%), 2 of 277 (1%), and 7 of 277 (3%) of patients for pelvic nodal, extrapelvic nodal, and bone metastatic disease. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for pelvic nodal metastases were 0.40 (95% CI, 0.34-0.46), 0.95 (95% CI, 0.92-0.97), 0.75 (95% CI, 0.70-0.80), and 0.81 (95% CI, 0.76-0.85), respectively. Of the 764 patients, 487 (64%) did not undergo prostatectomy, of which 108 were lost to follow-up. Patients with follow-up instead underwent radiotherapy (262 of 379 [69%]), systemic therapy (82 of 379 [22%]), surveillance (16 of 379 [4%]), or other treatments (19 of 379 [5%]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This phase 3 diagnostic efficacy trial found that in men with intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy and lymph node dissection, the sensitivity and specificity of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET were 0.40 and 0.95, respectively. This academic collaboration is the largest known to date and formed the foundation of a New Drug Application for 68Ga-PSMA-11.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT03368547, NCT02611882, and NCT02919111.

Indexed as

ProstateProstatic NeoplasmsAgedGallium IsotopesGallium RadioisotopesHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedPositron-Emission TomographyPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyProspective StudiesProstatectomygallium 68 PSMA-11Gallium IsotopesGallium Radioisotopes

Identifiers

PMID34529005
PMCPMC8446902
OpenAlexW3200874340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.