Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34528896›Full record

Observational studyJournal of medical Internet research2021

Mental Health Screening in General Practices as a Means for Enhancing Uptake of Digital Mental Health Interventions: Observational Cohort Study.

Alexis E Whitton, Rebecca Hardy, Kate Cope, Chilin Gieng, Leanne Gow, Andrew MacKinnon, Nyree Gale, Kathleen O'Moore, Josephine Anderson, Judith Proudfoot and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Consumer Perspectives on Anxiety Management in Australian General Practice.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexis E WhittonBlack Dog Institute, Randwick, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7944-2172
Rebecca HardyBlack Dog Institute, Randwick, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4953-273X
Kate CopeBlack Dog Institute, Randwick, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5223-3194
Chilin GiengBlack Dog Institute, Randwick, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8179-7899
Leanne GowBlack Dog Institute, Randwick, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1347-6804
Andrew MacKinnonBlack Dog Institute, Randwick, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0831-9801
Nyree GaleBlack Dog Institute, Randwick, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2733-3679
Kathleen O'MooreBlack Dog Institute, Randwick, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5211-9095
Josephine AndersonBlack Dog Institute, Randwick, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2936-0531
Judith ProudfootBlack Dog Institute, Randwick, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3872-9871
Nicole CockayneBlack Dog Institute, Randwick, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0155-1202
Bridianne O'DeaBlack Dog Institute, Randwick, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1731-210X
Helen ChristensenBlack Dog Institute, Randwick, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0435-2065
Jill Maree NewbyBlack Dog Institute, Randwick, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6473-9811
Black Dog Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigital mental health interventions stand to play a critical role in managing the mental health impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Thus, enhancing their uptake is a key priority. General practitioners (GPs) are well positioned to facilitate access to digital interventions, but tools that assist GPs in identifying suitable patients are lacking.

objectiveThis study aims to evaluate the suitability of a web-based mental health screening and treatment recommendation tool (StepCare) for improving the identification of anxiety and depression in general practice and, subsequently, uptake of digital mental health interventions.

methodsStepCare screens patients for symptoms of depression (9-item Patient Health Questionnaire) and anxiety (7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale) in the GP waiting room. It provides GPs with stepped treatment recommendations that include digital mental health interventions for patients with mild to moderate symptoms. Patients (N=5138) from 85 general practices across Australia were invited to participate in screening.

resultsScreening identified depressive or anxious symptoms in 43.09% (1428/3314) of patients (one-quarter were previously unidentified or untreated). The majority (300/335, 89.6%) of previously unidentified or untreated patients had mild to moderate symptoms and were candidates for digital mental health interventions. Although less than half were prescribed a digital intervention by their GP, when a digital intervention was prescribed, more than two-thirds of patients reported using it.

conclusionsImplementing web-based mental health screening in general practices can provide important opportunities for GPs to improve the identification of symptoms of mental illness and increase patient access to digital mental health interventions. Although GPs prescribed digital interventions less frequently than in-person psychotherapy or medication, the promising rates of uptake by GP-referred patients suggest that GPs can play a critical role in championing digital interventions and maximizing the associated benefits.

Indexed as

COVID-19General PracticeCohort StudiesHumansMental HealthPandemicsSARS-CoV-2anxietydepressiondigital mental healthgeneral practicescreening

Identifiers

PMID34528896
PMCPMC8485187
OpenAlexW3183660682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.