Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34528891›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2021

Acceptability and Potential Effectiveness of eHealth Tools for Training Primary Health Workers From Nigeria at Scale: Mixed Methods, Uncontrolled Before-and-After Study.

Joseph Paul Hicks, Matthew John Allsop, Godwin O Akaba, Ramsey M Yalma, Osasuyi Dirisu, Babasola Okusanya, Jamilu Tukur, Kehinde Okunade, David Akeju, Adegbenga Ajepe and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Scoping review of health information technology usability methods leveraged in Africa.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Joseph Paul Hicks *Nuffield Centre for International Health and Development, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0303-6207
Matthew John Allsop *Academic Unit of Palliative Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7399-0194
Godwin O AkabaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Abuja, Gwagwalada, Abuja, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0002-8149-5492
Ramsey M YalmaDepartment of Community Medicine, University of Abuja, Gwagwalada, Abuja, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0003-3390-0403
Osasuyi DirisuPopulation Council, Abuja, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0002-3701-8496
Babasola OkusanyaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0003-2381-873X
Jamilu TukurAminu Kano Teaching Hospital, Kano, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0002-1529-0448
Kehinde OkunadeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0002-0957-7389
David AkejuDepartment of Sociology, College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0001-9832-377X
Adegbenga AjepeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0002-4967-4597
Okey OkuzuInstrat Global Health Solutions, Abuja, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0002-8587-8431
Tolib MirzoevDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2959-9187
Bassey EbensoNuffield Centre for International Health and Development, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4147-0968
University of Lagos · NGUniversity of Leeds · GBUniversity of Abuja · NGAminu Kano Teaching Hospital · NGLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBMedical Laboratory Science Council of Nigeria · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe in-service training of frontline health workers (FHWs) in primary health care facilities plays an important role in improving the standard of health care delivery. However, it is often expensive and requires FHWs to leave their posts in rural areas to attend courses in urban centers. This study reports the implementation of a digital health tool for providing video training (VTR) on maternal, newborn, and child health (MNCH) care to provide in-service training at scale without interrupting health services. The VTR intervention was supported by satellite communications technology and existing 3G mobile networks.

objectiveThis study aims to determine the feasibility and acceptability of these digital health tools and their potential effectiveness in improving clinical knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to MNCH care.

methodsA mixed methods design, including an uncontrolled pre- and postquantitative evaluation, was adopted. From October 2017 to May 2018, a VTR mobile intervention was delivered to FHWs in 3 states of Nigeria. We examined changes in workers' knowledge and confidence in delivering MNCH services through a pre- and posttest survey. Stakeholders' experiences with the intervention were explored through semistructured interviews that drew on the technology acceptance model to frame contextual factors that shaped the intervention's acceptability and usability in the work environment.

resultsIn total, 328 FHWs completed both pre- and posttests. FHWs achieved a mean pretest score of 51% (95% CI 48%-54%) and mean posttest score of 69% (95% CI 66%-72%), reflecting, after adjusting for key covariates, a mean increase between the pre- and posttest of 17 percentage points (95% CI 15-19; P<.001). Variation was identified in pre- and posttest scores by the sex and location of participants alongside topic-specific areas where scores were lowest. Stakeholder interviews suggested a wide acceptance of VTR Mobile (delivered via digital technology) as an important tool for enhancing the quality of training, reinforcing knowledge, and improving health outcomes.

conclusionsThis study found that VTR supported through a digital technology approach is a feasible and acceptable approach for supporting improvements in clinical knowledge, attitudes, and reported practices in MNCH. The determinants of technology acceptance included ease of use, perceived usefulness, access to technology and training contents, and the cost-effectiveness of VTR, whereas barriers to the adoption of VTR were poor electricity supply, poor internet connection, and FHWs' workload. The evaluation also identified the mechanisms of the impact of delivering VTR Mobile at scale on the micro (individual), meso (organizational), and macro (policy) levels of the health system. Future research is required to explore the translation of this digital health approach for the VTR of FHWs and its impact across low-resource settings to ameliorate the financial and time costs of training and support high-quality MNCH care delivery.

trial registrationISRCTN Registry 32105372; https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN32105372.

Indexed as

Child Health ServicesTelemedicineChildDelivery of Health CareHealth PersonnelHumansInfant, NewbornNigeriadigital health technologyeHealthmaternal and child healthmobile phoneNigeriaprimary health worker trainingvideo-based training

Identifiers

PMID34528891
PMCPMC8485189
OpenAlexW3192105592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.