ArticleEuropean journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe2022
3-Dimensional simulations and student learning in orthodontic education.
Article in European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of typodont and simulation training in orthodontic education: a systematic review.BMC medical education · 2024Pooled it
- Student Perceptions of 360European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe · 2026Article
- Digital Versus Conventional Appliance Fabrication in Orthodontics: A Prospective Cohort Study on Students' Perception of Education.Journal of dental education · 2026Article
- The landscape of virtual simulation in undergraduate dental education with implications for artificial intelligence incorporation.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- A web-based augmented reality system for orthodontic biomechanics: perceived usability and acceptability among dental students.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- A novel extended flipped classroom model helps dental undergraduates grow into dentists.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Dental Undergraduate Students' Perceptions of Blended Learning in the COVID-19 and Post-COVID-19 Years: Survey Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Interdisciplinary problem-based learning model for standardized dental residency training: from theory to practice in dental trauma management.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Technology-enhanced simulation-based learning in orthodontic education: A scoping review.Dental press journal of orthodontics · 2023Article
- 3-Dimensional simulations and student learning in orthodontic education.European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe electronic dental model (e-model) is an example of a digital 3-dimensional technology to support inquiry-based learning in undergraduate dental education. As student perceptions of and engagement with e-models vary, it is uncertain whether these perceptions have implications for their learning processes and outcomes. MATERIALS AND
methodsThird-year dental students (N = 40) completed a questionnaire to identify their perceptions of and preferences for model modalities. They were divided into three groups based on their preference: Preferring plaster models (Group 1); Preferring e-models (Group 2); No preference (Group 3). Students from three groups (N = 9) attended a hands-on digital occlusion evaluation workshop, and then completed a case-based diagnostic evaluation test using digital occlusion evaluation software. Camtasia Studio™ recorded real-time and on-screen data of the number of mouse-clicks and time spent.
resultsStudents reported positive feedbacks on the use of e-models, and 72.5% of the students preferred combination use of e-models and plaster models. After attending the hands-on digital dental occlusion evaluation workshop, Group 2 scored higher on the diagnostic evaluation test (p < .05) and registered more mouse-clicks than Group 1 when evaluating the arch symmetry (p < .05). Group 2 registered fewer mouse-clicks than Group 3 during tooth size measurement (p < .05). There was no significant difference regarding the time used to answer the knowledge questions amongst the three groups.
conclusionUndergraduate dental students indicated a generally high acceptance of e-models for their learning in orthodontics, and more prefer a blended approach. Students preferring e-models presented higher performance outcomes, which supports cognitive load theory regarding prior exposure to simulation-based environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.