Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34528701›Full record

ReviewClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2022

Evolving Acceptance and Use of RWE for Regulatory Decision Making on the Benefit/Risk Assessment of a Drug in Japan.

Kinue Nishioka, Tomomi Makimura, Akihiro Ishiguro, Takahiro Nonaka, Mitsune Yamaguchi, Yoshiaki Uyama

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The emerging role of real-world data in oncology care in Japan.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kinue NishiokaOffice of New Drug III, Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, Tokyo, Japan.
Tomomi MakimuraOffice of Standards and Compliance for Medical Devices, Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, Tokyo, Japan.
Akihiro IshiguroOffice of Research Promotion, Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, Tokyo, Japan.
Takahiro NonakaOffice of Medical Informatics and Epidemiology, Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, Tokyo, Japan.
Mitsune YamaguchiOffice of Non-clinical and Clinical Compliance, Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshiaki UyamaOffice of Medical Informatics and Epidemiology, Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is growing interest in the utilization of real-world data (RWD) and real-world evidence (RWE) for regulatory purposes. However, there are challenges in the practical utilization of RWD to provide RWE as a basis for regulatory decision making. This article presents the regulatory initiatives in Japan and efforts taken to promote the utilization of RWD/RWE for regulatory decision making at the pre- and postapproval stages of a drug. There has been a rapid increase in the number of RWD cases evaluated for drug safety assessment in Japan. Nevertheless, more regulatory experiences and considerations are necessary for the utilization of RWD in the efficacy evaluation of a drug. Based on past experiences, data reliability and appropriateness of the methodology for analysis are the major discussion points in utilizing RWD and RWE for regulatory decision making. International harmonization of regulatory requirements is another important area in utilizing RWD and sharing the RWE globally. We describe our perspective on providing RWE, which is useful for regulatory decision making throughout a drug's life cycle.

Indexed as

Decision MakingResearch DesignDrug ApprovalDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHumansJapanRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID34528701
PMCPMC9290512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.