ArticleMolecular medicine reports2021
[Corrigendum] Murine and Chinese cobra venom‑derived nerve growth factor stimulate chondrogenic differentiation of BMSCs
Article in Molecular medicine reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Subsequently to the publication of this paper, an interested reader drew to the authors' attention that Figs. 2 and 3, showing the results from experiments designed to assess the viability of bone‑derived mesenchymal stem cells culture with or without nerve growth factors (NGFs) via fluorescein diacetate/propidium iodide or H&E staining respectively, contained apparently duplicated data panels within the figures. After having examined their original data, the authors have realized that these figures were inadvertently assembled incorrectly, and that there were also misassembled data panels in Fig. 6, which showed the secretion of types I and II collagens in bone‑derived mesenchymal stem cells with or without NGFs. The corrected versions of Figs. 2, 3 and 6 are shown below and on the next page. Note that these errors did not significantly affect the results or the conclusions reported in this paper, and all the authors agree to this Corrigendum. Furthermore, the authors apologize to the readership for any inconvenience caused. [the original article was published in
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.