Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34528519›Full record

ArticleSaudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association

Development and validation of a predictive model for feeding intolerance in intensive care unit patients with sepsis.

Kunlin Hu, Xin Lei Deng, Lin Han, Shulin Xiang, Bin Xiong, Liao Pinhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Use of Machine Learning Models to Predict Microaspiration Measured by Tracheal Pepsin A.American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Role of artificial intelligence in critical care nutrition support and research.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Predicting enteral feeding intolerance in patients with sepsis: Why and how?Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kunlin HuDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The First Clinical Medical College of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province; Department of Intensive Care Unit, the People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, China.
Xin Lei DengDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, University at Albany, State University of New York, USA.
Lin HanDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Yong wu Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, China.
Shulin XiangDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, the People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, China.
Bin XiongDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, the People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, China.
Liao PinhuDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFeeding intolerance in patients with sepsis is associated with a lower enteral nutrition (EN) intake and worse clinical outcomes. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a predictive model for enteral feeding intolerance in the intensive care unit patients with sepsis.

methodsIn this dual-center, retrospective, case-control study, a total of 195 intensive care unit patients with sepsis were enrolled from June 2018 to June 2020. Data of 124 patients for 27 clinical indicators from one hospital were used to train the model, and data from 71 patients from another hospital were used to assess the external predictive performance. The predictive models included logistic regression, naive Bayesian, random forest, gradient boosting tree, and deep learning (multilayer artificial neural network) models.

resultsEighty-six (44.1%) patients were diagnosed with enteral feeding intolerance. The deep learning model achieved the best performance, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.82 (95% confidence interval = 0.74-0.90) and 0.79 (95% confidence interval = 0.68-0.89) in the training and external sets, respectively. The deep learning model showed good calibration; based on the decision curve analysis, the model's clinical benefit was considered useful. Lower respiratory tract infection was the most important contributing factor, followed by peptide EN and shock.

conclusionsThe new prediction model based on deep learning can effectively predict enteral feeding intolerance in intensive care unit patients with sepsis. Simple clinical information such as infection site, nutrient type, and septic shock can be useful in stratifying a septic patient's risk of EN intolerance.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsSepsisBayes TheoremCase-Control StudiesHumansInfant, NewbornRetrospective StudiesDeep learningenteral feeding intolerancepredictive modelsepsis

Identifiers

PMID34528519
PMCPMC8919923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.