Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34528314›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2021

Identification of a six-microRNA signature as a potential diagnostic biomarker in breast cancer tissues.

Mojdeh Mahmoudian, Ehsan Razmara, Bashdar Mahmud Hussen, Mandana Simiyari, Nazanin Lotfizadeh, Hoda Motaghed, Arefeh Khazraei Monfared, Maryam Montazeri, Sadegh Babashah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. microRNA Detection via Nanostructured Biochips for Early Cancer Diagnostics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mojdeh MahmoudianDepartment of Genetics, Faculty of Sciences, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Ehsan RazmaraDepartment of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9926-3975
Bashdar Mahmud HussenDepartment of Pharmacognosy, College of Pharmacy, Hawler Medical University, Kurdistan Region, Iraq.
Mandana SimiyariDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran.
Nazanin LotfizadehDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Advanced Science and Technology, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Hoda MotaghedDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Advanced Science and Technology, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Arefeh Khazraei MonfaredDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Islamic Azad University-Tehran North Branch, Tehran, Iran.
Maryam MontazeriDepartment of Medical Biotechnology, Faculty of Advanced Science and Technology, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Sadegh BabashahDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7066-0918

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer (BC) is by far the most common malignancy among women. Epigenetic modulators, microRNAs in particular, may set stages for BC development and its progression. Herein, we aimed to assess the diagnostic potentiality of a signature of six miRNAs (i.e., hsa-miR-25-3p, -29a-5p, -105-3p, -181b1-5p, -335-5p, and -339-5p) in BC and adjacent non-tumor tissues.

methodsA pair of 50 tumor and adjacent non-tumor samples were taken from BC patients. The expression of each candidate miRNA was measured using quantitative reverse transcription PCR. To investigate the possible roles of each miRNA and their impressions on BC prognosis, in silico tools were used. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were performed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of each miRNA and the possible association of their expression with clinicopathological characteristics was analyzed.

resultsOur findings showed the upregulation of hsa-miR-25-3p, -29a-5p, -105-3p, and -181b1-5p, and the downregulation of hsa-miR-335-5p and -339-5p in BC tumor compared to corresponding adjacent tissues. Except for hsa-miR-339-5p, the up-/down-regulation of the candidate miRNAs was associated with TNM stages. Except for hsa-miR-105-3p, each candidate miRNA was correlated with HER-2 status. ROC curve analysis showed that the signature of six-miRNA is a potential biomarker distinguishing between tumor and non-tumor breast tissue samples.

conclusionWe showed that the dysregulation of a novel signature of six-miRNA can be used as a potential biomarker for BC diagnosis.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorBreastFemaleHumansMicroRNAsMiddle AgedTranscriptomeBiomarkers, TumorMicroRNAsbiomarkerbreast cancerbreast tissuediagnosismiRNA signature

Identifiers

PMID34528314
PMCPMC8605139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.