ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2022
How can urban agglomeration market integration promote urban green development: evidence from China's Yangtze River Economic Belt.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of Digital Transformation on Enterprise Carbon Intensity: The Moderating Role of Digital Information Resources.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Green development of cities has been gaining attention worldwide, especially in urban agglomerations, where market integration is promoting. However, it is not clear whether the market integration in urban agglomerations is conducive to promote the green development of cities. Hence, this research aims to address this question. This research employed the data of 100 cities in China's Yangtze River Economic Belt from 2006 to 2019 and a comprehensive analytic framework including a panel threshold model to explore the impact of urban agglomeration market integration on urban green development and the nonlinear adjustment mechanism. The main findings are shown below: (1) urban agglomerations market integration was found to be significant to promote green development of the city, but there are two dimensions: the horizontal dimension and the efficiency dimension, (2) the optimal dimensions for urban agglomeration market integration to promote green development of the city were found has regional and urban heterogeneity. Therefore, it is necessary for the city to formulate differentiated green development strategies, (3) when human capital advancement and knowledge sharing intervene, urban agglomeration market integration will have a "jumping" threshold impact on green development of the city through the level path; and under the adjustment of environmental regulations and the green transformation mechanism of the industrial structure, the influence of the urban agglomeration market integration on the efficiency of urban green development presents a "U-shaped" threshold characteristic, (4) lastly, the conclusions enlighten urban agglomeration market integration and heterogeneous green development model for approaching a better performance in urban green development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34528199What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.