Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34528169›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of medical humanities2021

Developing New Academic Programs in the Medical/Health Humanities: A Toolkit to Support Continued Growth.

Craig M Klugman, Rachel Conrad Bracken, Rosemary I Weatherston, Catherine Burns Konefal, Sarah L Berry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of medical humanities, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Embedding Music in Care at Mayo Clinic.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Craig M KlugmanDePaul University (Health Sciences), Chicago, IL, USA. cklugman@depaul.edu.
Rachel Conrad BrackenNortheast Ohio Medical University (Family and Community Medicine), Rootstown, OH, USA.
Rosemary I WeatherstonUniversity of Detroit Mercy (English), Detroit, MI, USA.
Catherine Burns KonefalRutgers University Bloustein School (Health Administration and Public Health), New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Sarah L BerryState University of New York at Oswego (English), Oswego, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Academic programs in the medical/health humanities have proliferated widely in recent years, and the professional, academic, and cultural drivers of this growth promise sustained new program development. In this article, we present the results of a survey sent to representatives of one hundred twenty-four baccalaureate and ten graduate programs in the medical/health humanities to assess the experiences and needs of existing programs. Survey results confirm the interest in and need for a descriptive toolkit as opposed to a prescriptive manual; indicate what data and materials are most needed to support the successful development of new academic programs in the field; and identify areas for future research. Recognizing a need for program development resources, the Health Humanities Consortium (HHC) has initiated the creation of a comprehensive online toolkit. We discuss survey results and the toolkit in relation to the drivers of new program growth. Finally, we describe resources now available through the HHC's new online program toolkit, including existing programs; sample syllabi; sample curricula templates; program rationale; proposal templates; and graduation data.

Indexed as

CurriculumHumanitiesProgram DevelopmentSurveys and QuestionnairesCurriculumDegree program developmentEducationHealth humanitiesMedical humanitiesProgram design

Identifiers

PMID34528169
PMCPMC8443396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.