Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34528130›Full record

ArticleInternational archives of occupational and environmental health2022

Sedentary work and participation in leisure-time physical activity.

Sven van As, Debby G J Beckers, Harm Veling, Wendela Hooftman, Michiel A J Kompier, Sabine A E Geurts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International archives of occupational and environmental health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sven van AsBehavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, 6525 GD, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. sven.vanas@ru.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1177-6475
Debby G J BeckersBehavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, 6525 GD, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8676-0518
Harm VelingBehavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, 6525 GD, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5648-2980
Wendela HooftmanTNO, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Michiel A J KompierBehavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, 6525 GD, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Sabine A E GeurtsBehavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, 6525 GD, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5125-5693

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDemanding psychosocial work characteristics, such as high job demands, can have a detrimental impact on leisure-time physical activity (LTPA), with adverse consequences for employee health and well-being. However, the mechanisms and moderators of this crossover effect are still largely unknown. We therefore aimed to identify and test potential mediating and moderating factors from within and outside the work environment. Based on the previous research, we expected job demands to be negatively related to LTPA through fatigue. In addition, we expected that job control and worktime control would attenuate the relationship between job demands and fatigue. Furthermore, we hypothesized that autonomous exercise motivation and spontaneous action planning would attenuate the relationship between fatigue and LTPA. In addition to these cross-sectional hypotheses, we expected the same effects to predict a change in LTPA in the following year.

methodsTo investigate these assumptions, a preregistered longitudinal survey study was conducted among a large sample of Dutch employees in sedentary jobs. Participants reported on the constructs of interest in 2017 and 2018 (N = 1189 and 665 respectively) and the resulting data were analyzed using path analyses.

resultsOur cross-sectional analyses confirm a weak indirect, negative association between job demands and LTPA, via fatigue. However, this finding was not observed in our longitudinal analyses and none of the other hypotheses were confirmed.

conclusionThis study shows that, among employees with relatively healthy psychosocial work characteristics (i.e., high job control), the evidence for an impact of these work characteristics on participation in LTPA is limited.

Indexed as

Leisure ActivitiesOccupational HealthCross-Sectional StudiesExerciseHumansWorkplaceFatigueLeisure–time physical activityMotivationOccupational healthPsychosocial job characteristics

Identifiers

PMID34528130
PMCPMC8795020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.