Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34528125›Full record

ArticleWiener klinische Wochenschrift2021

Postoperative chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin is superior to radioimmunotherapy with cetuximab and radiotherapy alone : Analysis of the Austrian head and neck cancer registry of the AGMT.

Teresa Magnes, Sandro M Wagner, Thomas Melchardt, Lukas Weiss, Gabriel Rinnerthaler, Florian Huemer, Michael Kopp, Simon Peter Gampenrieder, Beate Mayrbäurl, Thorsten Füreder and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Teresa MagnesIIIrd Medical Department, Paracelsus Medical University, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
Sandro M WagnerIIIrd Medical Department, Paracelsus Medical University, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
Thomas MelchardtIIIrd Medical Department, Paracelsus Medical University, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
Lukas WeissIIIrd Medical Department, Paracelsus Medical University, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
Gabriel RinnerthalerIIIrd Medical Department, Paracelsus Medical University, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
Florian HuemerIIIrd Medical Department, Paracelsus Medical University, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
Michael KoppAbteilung für Innere Medizin IV, Hämatologie, internistische Onkologie und Palliativmedizin, Nephrologie und Dialyse, Klinikum Wels-Grieskirchen GmbH, Grieskirchner Straße 42, 4600, Wels, Austria.
Simon Peter GampenriederIIIrd Medical Department, Paracelsus Medical University, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
Beate MayrbäurlAbteilung für Innere Medizin IV, Hämatologie, internistische Onkologie und Palliativmedizin, Nephrologie und Dialyse, Klinikum Wels-Grieskirchen GmbH, Grieskirchner Straße 42, 4600, Wels, Austria.
Thorsten FürederUniversitätsklinik für Innere Medizin I: Klinische Abteilung für Onkologie, AKH Meduni Wien, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Daniel LengerMed. Campus III-Hämatologie und Internistische Onkologie, Kepler Universitätsklinikum GmbH Linz, Krankenhausstraße 9, 4021, Linz, Austria.
Johannes AndelAbteilung für Innere Medizin 2, Pyhrn-Eisenwurzen Klinikum Steyr, Sierninger Straße 170, 4400, Steyr, Austria.
Alexander EgleIIIrd Medical Department, Paracelsus Medical University, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
Richard GreilIIIrd Medical Department, Paracelsus Medical University, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria. r.greil@salk.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4462-3694
Paracelsus Medical University · ATKlinikum Wels-Grieskirchen · ATUniversity of Salzburg · ATKepler Universitätsklinikum · ATUniversitätsklinik für Chirurgie Wien · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe addition of cisplatin or cetuximab to radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) has significantly improved the outcome. While the superiority of cisplatin over cetuximab in combination with radiotherapy has been shown in a definitive setting, we set out to compare postoperative chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin to radioimmunotherapy with cetuximab and radiotherapy alone within the Austrian head and neck cancer registry of the Working Group on Pharmaceutical Tumor Treatment (AGMT) study group. MATERIAL AND

methodsIn the AGMT head and neck cancer registry, data of 557 patients with SCCHN from five Austrian cancer centers were prospectively collected between 2012 and 2017. Of these patients 120 received postoperative chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin, 26 patients received postoperative radioimmunotherapy with cetuximab and 56 patients were treated with adjuvant radiotherapy only. Patient characteristics, stage of disease, details on treatment as well as survival were analyzed by a chart-based review.

resultsIn patients treated with postoperative radiotherapy the addition of cisplatin significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to cetuximab (PFS 84.2 months vs. 17.0 months, p = 0.04, OS not reached vs. 46.0 months, p = 0.02) and PFS compared to radiotherapy alone (PFS 84.2 months vs. 28.5 months, p < 0.01). Patients treated with cetuximab were significantly older and had a worse performance score than patients receiving cisplatin or radiotherapy alone.

conclusionThis study confirmed the importance of multimodal treatment concepts in patients with locally advanced SCCHN. Postoperative cetuximab might be an option in patients not eligible for high-dose cisplatin but cisplatin should remain the standard of care.

Indexed as

CisplatinHead and Neck NeoplasmsAustriaCetuximabChemoradiotherapyHumansRadioimmunotherapyRegistriesCetuximabCisplatinAdjuvantCetuximabCisplatinHead and neck cancerSquamous cell carcinoma of head and neck

Identifiers

PMID34528125
PMCPMC8599358
OpenAlexW3199966003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.