Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34528074›Full record

Trial reportRheumatology (Oxford, England)2022

Vascular imaging of patients with refractory Takayasu arteritis treated with tocilizumab: post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

Yoshikazu Nakaoka, Masahiro Yanagawa, Akinori Hata, Katsuhisa Yamashita, Norihiro Okada, Shinji Yamakido, Hiromitsu Hayashi, David Jayne

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Management of Takayasu Arteritis - A 2026 Update.Current rheumatology reports · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. [Granuloma faciale and Takayasu arteritis in a child: a case report].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Yoshikazu NakaokaDepartment of Vascular Physiology, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Centre Research Institute, Suita.ORCID 0000-0002-8404-2587
Masahiro YanagawaDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka.
Akinori HataDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka.
Katsuhisa YamashitaMedical Science Department, Medical Affairs.
Norihiro OkadaBiometrics Department.
Shinji YamakidoDepartment of Primary Clinical Development, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Tokyo.
Hiromitsu HayashiDepartment of Radiology, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.
David JayneDepartment of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
The University of Osaka · JPChugai Pharma (United States) · USNational Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center · JPNippon Medical School · JPUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N011775/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTocilizumab, an anti-IL-6 receptor antibody, was investigated in patients with refractory Takayasu arteritis (TAK) in a phase 3 randomized controlled trial. In this post hoc analysis, we investigated whether tocilizumab treatment inhibited the progression of vascular lesions caused by TAK in these patients.

methodsIncluded patients received at least one dose of tocilizumab and underwent CT at baseline and at week 48 after tocilizumab initiation. Three radiologists not involved in the original trial independently evaluated the CT images. Twenty-two arteries from each patient were assessed for change from baseline in wall thickness (primary endpoint), dilatation/aneurysm, stenosis/occlusion or wall enhancement for at least 96 weeks after tocilizumab initiation. Patient-level assessments were also conducted.

resultsIn 28 patients, 86.7% of 22 arteries had improved or stable wall thickness at week 96. Proportions of patients with improved or stable, partially progressed or newly progressed lesions were 57.1%, 10.7% and 28.6%, respectively, for wall thickness; proportions with improved or stable lesions were 92.9% for dilatation/aneurysm, and 85.7% for stenosis/occlusion. Patients with newly progressed lesions, reflecting more refractory disease, were prescribed glucocorticoids at dosages that could not be reduced below 0.1 mg/kg/day at week 96.

conclusionsApproximately 60% of patients with TAK did not experience progression in wall thickness within 96 weeks after initiation of tocilizumab treatment. Few patients experienced progressed dilatation/aneurysm, or stenosis/occlusion. Wall thickness progression likely resulted from refractory TAK. Patients who experience this should be monitored regularly by imaging, and additional glucocorticoid or immunosuppressive treatment should be considered to avoid vascular progression.

trial registrationJapan Pharmaceutical Information Centre number, JapicCTI-142616.

Indexed as

Takayasu ArteritisAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedConstriction, PathologicGlucocorticoidsHumansAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedGlucocorticoidstocilizumabbiological therapiescardiovascularCT scanningTakayasu’s diseasevasculitis

Identifiers

PMID34528074
PMCPMC9157117
OpenAlexW3200840066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.