Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34527985›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2021

Validation of the Interagency Integrated Triage Tool in a resource-limited, urban emergency department in Papua New Guinea: a pilot study.

Rob Mitchell, Ovia Bue, Gary Nou, Jude Taumomoa, Ware Vagoli, Steven Jack, Colin Banks, Gerard O'Reilly, Sarah Bornstein, Tracie Ham and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Triage systems in low-resource emergency care settings.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. History of emergency medicine in Bhutan.International journal of emergency medicine · 2024
    Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. A prospective, internal validation of an emergency patient triage tool for use in a low resource setting.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. What is the ideal triage process and the resources it requires?The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Rob MitchellEmergency Physician, Emergency & Trauma Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia PhD Candidate, Department of Epidemiology & Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Ovia BueEmergency Physician, Emergency Department, Gerehu General Hospital, Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea.
Gary NouEmergency Physician, Emergency Department, Gerehu General Hospital, Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea.
Jude TaumomoaClinical Nurse, Emergency Department, Gerehu General Hospital, Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea.
Ware VagoliEmergency Physician, Emergency Department, Gerehu General Hospital, Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea.
Steven JackEmergency Physician, Emergency Department, Gerehu General Hospital, Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea.
Colin BanksEmergency Physician, Emergency Department, Townsville University Hospital, Townsville, Australia.
Gerard O'ReillyEmergency Physician and Head of Global Programs, Emergency & Trauma Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia, Associate Professor, Department of Epidemiology & Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Sarah BornsteinProject lead, Papua New Guinea Emergency Care Capacity Development Remote Training and Support Model Project, Australasian College for Emergency Medicine, Melbourne, Australia.
Tracie HamAssociate Nurse Unit Manager, Emergency Department, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Travis ColeEmergency Clinical Nurse Specialist, Emergency Department, Townsville University Hospital, Townsville, Australia.
Teri ReynoldsUnit Head, Clinical Services and Systems, Department of Integrated Health Services, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Sarah KörverGlobal Emergency Care Manager, Australasian College for Emergency Medicine, Melbourne, Australia.
Peter CameronDirector of Academic Programs, Emergency & Trauma Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia,Professor, Department of Epidemiology & Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Interagency Integrated Triage Tool (IITT) is a three-tier triage system designed for resource-limited emergency care (EC) settings. This study sought to assess the validity and reliability of a pilot version of the tool in an urban emergency department (ED) in Papua New Guinea.

methodsA pragmatic observational study was conducted at Gerehu General Hospital in Port Moresby, commencing eight weeks after IITT implementation. All ED patients presenting within the subsequent two-month period were included. Triage assessments were performed by a variety of ED clinicians, including community health workers, nurses and doctors. The primary outcome was sensitivity for the detection of time-critical illness, defined by ten pre-specified diagnoses. The association between triage category and ED outcomes was examined using Cramer's V correlation coefficient. Reliability was assessed by inter-rater agreement between a local and an experienced, external triage officer.

findingsAmong 4512 presentations during the study period, 58 (1.3%) were classified as category one (emergency), 967 (21.6%) as category two (priority) and 3478 (77.1%) as category three (non-urgent). The tool's sensitivity for detecting the pre-specified set of time-sensitive conditions was 70.8% (95%CI 58.2-81.4%), with negative predictive values of 97.3% (95%CI 96.7 - 97.8%) for admission/transfer and 99.9% (95%CI 99.7 - 100.0%) for death. The admission/transfer rate was 44.8% (26/58) among emergency patients, 22.9% (223/976) among priority patients and 2.7% (94/3478) among non-urgent patients (Cramer's V=0.351, p=0.00). Four of 58 (6.9%) emergency patients, 19/976 (2.0%) priority patients and 3/3478 (0.1%) non-urgent patients died in the ED (Cramer's V=0.14, p=0.00). The under-triage rate was 2.7% (94/3477) and the over-triage rate 48.2% (28/58), both within pre-specified limits of acceptability. On average, it took staff 3 minutes 34 seconds (SD 1:06) to determine and document a triage category. Among 70 observed assessments, weighted

interpretationThe pilot version of the IITT demonstrated acceptable performance characteristics, and validation in other EC settings is warranted.

fundingThis project was funded through a Friendship Grant from the Australian Government Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade and an International Development Fund Grant from the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine Foundation.

Identifiers

PMID34527985
PMCPMC8358156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.