Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34527984›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2021

Differences in the potential for dementia prevention between major ethnic groups within one country: A cross sectional analysis of population attributable fraction of potentially modifiable risk factors in New Zealand.

Etuini Ma'u, Sarah Cullum, Gary Cheung, Gill Livingston, Naaheed Mukadam

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Umbrella review and Delphi study on modifiable factors for dementia risk reduction.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Risk, protective, and biomarkers of dementia in Indigenous peoples: A systematic review.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Mapping the Young-Onset Dementia Research in the Asia-Pacific Region: A Scoping Review.Asia-Pacific psychiatry : official journal of the Pacific Rim College of Psychiatrists · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Advancing brain health equity with Indigenous peoples: A critical imperative.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Review
  10. Advancing global dementia research through equity and inclusion.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Sex differences in modifiable dementia risk factors: Findings from the Rush Memory and Aging Project.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Estimating the impact of risk factor reduction on dementia prevalence in New Zealand.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Etuini Ma'uDepartment of Psychological Medicine, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
Sarah CullumDepartment of Psychological Medicine, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
Gary CheungDepartment of Psychological Medicine, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
Gill LivingstonDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK; Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, St Pancras Hospital, London, UK.
Naaheed MukadamDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK; Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, St Pancras Hospital, London, UK.
University of Auckland · NZSt Pancras Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTwelve potentially modifiable risk factors (less education, hypertension, obesity, alcohol, traumatic brain injury (TBI), hearing loss, smoking, depression, physical inactivity, social isolation, diabetes, air pollution) account for an estimated 40% of worldwide dementia cases. We aimed to calculate population attributable fractions (PAFs) for dementia for the four largest New Zealand ethnic groups (European, Māori, Asian, and Pacific peoples) to identify whether optimal dementia prevention targets differed by ethnicity.

methodsWe calculated risk factor prevalence for 10 risk factors using the New Zealand Health Survey 2018/19 and published reports for hearing loss and TBI prevalences. We calculated the PAF for each risk factor using calculated prevalence and relative risk estimates from previous meta-analyses. To account for risk factor overlap, we calculated communality of risk factors and a weighted PAF.

findingsThe weighted PAF for dementia was 47.7% overall in New Zealand, 47.6% for Europeans, 51.4% for Māori, 50.8% for Pacific peoples, and 40.8% for Asians. Highest PAFs for Europeans were hearing loss (8%) and social isolation (5.7%), and for Asians hearing loss (7.3%) and physical inactivity (5.5%). For Māori and Pacific peoples, highest PAFs were for obesity (7.3% and 8.9% respectively) and hearing loss (6.5% and 6.6%).

interpretationNew Zealand has higher dementia prevention potential than worldwide estimates with high prevalences of untreated hearing loss and obesity. The relative contribution of individual risk factors PAFs varies by ethnic group. Public health strategies for dementia prevention need to be tailored to these differences.

fundingHealth Research Council of New Zealand (HRC:20/021).

Identifiers

PMID34527984
PMCPMC8358157
OpenAlexW3177707402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.