Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34527973›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2021

Comparison of detection strategies for screening and confirming congenital cytomegalovirus infection in newborns in a highly seroprevalent population: a mother-child cohort study.

Yue Huang, Han Wang, Tingdong Li, Caihong Li, Jiabao Tang, Huan Yu, Xiaoyi Guo, Qiaoqiao Song, Feixue Wei, Jiangding Wang and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yue HuangState Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics, National Institute of Diagnostics and Vaccine Development in Infectious Diseases, Strait Collaborative Innovation Center of Biomedicine and Pharmaceutics, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, Fujian, China.
Han WangState Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics, National Institute of Diagnostics and Vaccine Development in Infectious Diseases, Strait Collaborative Innovation Center of Biomedicine and Pharmaceutics, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, Fujian, China.
Tingdong LiState Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics, National Institute of Diagnostics and Vaccine Development in Infectious Diseases, Strait Collaborative Innovation Center of Biomedicine and Pharmaceutics, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, Fujian, China.
Caihong LiXinmi Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Xinmi 452300, Henan, China.
Jiabao TangState Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics, National Institute of Diagnostics and Vaccine Development in Infectious Diseases, Strait Collaborative Innovation Center of Biomedicine and Pharmaceutics, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, Fujian, China.
Huan YuState Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics, National Institute of Diagnostics and Vaccine Development in Infectious Diseases, Strait Collaborative Innovation Center of Biomedicine and Pharmaceutics, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, Fujian, China.
Xiaoyi GuoState Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics, National Institute of Diagnostics and Vaccine Development in Infectious Diseases, Strait Collaborative Innovation Center of Biomedicine and Pharmaceutics, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, Fujian, China.
Qiaoqiao SongState Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics, National Institute of Diagnostics and Vaccine Development in Infectious Diseases, Strait Collaborative Innovation Center of Biomedicine and Pharmaceutics, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, Fujian, China.
Feixue WeiState Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics, National Institute of Diagnostics and Vaccine Development in Infectious Diseases, Strait Collaborative Innovation Center of Biomedicine and Pharmaceutics, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, Fujian, China.
Jiangding WangJiaxian Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Jiaxian 467100, Henan, China.
Caihong LiangZhongmu Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Zhongmu 451450, Henan, China.
Fengxian ZhengXinmi Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Xinmi 452300, Henan, China.
Hongjuan LiXinmi Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Xinmi 452300, Henan, China.
Huifeng LiXinmi Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Xinmi 452300, Henan, China.
Hongguo WuJiaxian Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Jiaxian 467100, Henan, China.
Zhaoxin LuZhongmu Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Zhongmu 451450, Henan, China.
Yingying SuState Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics, National Institute of Diagnostics and Vaccine Development in Infectious Diseases, Strait Collaborative Innovation Center of Biomedicine and Pharmaceutics, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, Fujian, China.
Ting WuState Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics, National Institute of Diagnostics and Vaccine Development in Infectious Diseases, Strait Collaborative Innovation Center of Biomedicine and Pharmaceutics, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, Fujian, China.
Shengxiang GeState Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics, National Institute of Diagnostics and Vaccine Development in Infectious Diseases, Strait Collaborative Innovation Center of Biomedicine and Pharmaceutics, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, Fujian, China.
Tong-Ming FuTexas Therapeutics Institute, Brown Foundation Institute of Molecular Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Jun ZhangState Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics, National Institute of Diagnostics and Vaccine Development in Infectious Diseases, Strait Collaborative Innovation Center of Biomedicine and Pharmaceutics, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, Fujian, China.
Ningshao XiaState Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics, National Institute of Diagnostics and Vaccine Development in Infectious Diseases, Strait Collaborative Innovation Center of Biomedicine and Pharmaceutics, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, Fujian, China.
Xiamen University · CNMaternal and Child Health Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region · CNThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUniversal screening of congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) infection is important for monitoring and intervention during critical stages of speech and language development. This study aimed to explore the optimal detection strategy for cCMV infection screening.

methodsSerum samples from pregnant women and saliva and urine samples from their newborns were collected for the anti-CMV IgG and CMV DNA PCR tests, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values as well as the likelihood ratios of 12 potential screening strategies for cCMV infection, based on tests for saliva, urine, and their combination, were evaluated.

findingsA total of 6729 pregnant women were enrolled, and the seroprevalence was 98.1%. Among 6350 newborns that were followed up, 49 were defined as having cCMV infection. In the screening test, the CMV DNA positivity rate remained similar from day 0 to day 5, increased slowly from day 6 to day 13, and became high in newborns beyond 13 days of birth. In the confirmatory testing, the positive rates increased significantly beyond day 21. For the 49 newborns with cCMV infection, the proportion of agreement between saliva and urine testing was poor. Upon evaluating alternative screening strategies, using saliva and urine screening with saliva and urine confirmation as the reference strategy, saliva screening with saliva and urine confirmation showed good diagnostic accuracy and feasibility, with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive and negative predictive values of 85.7%, 100.0%, 100.0% and 99.9%, respectively.

interpretationIn populations with high seroprevalence, saliva screening with saliva and urine confirmation might be an alternative strategy for screening cCMV infections. The suggested timeframes for screening and confirmation are within 13 (ideally 5) and 21 (ideally 13) days of birth, respectively.

fundingNational Natural Science Foundation of China, National Science and Technology Major Project of China and Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey, U.S.A.

Identifiers

PMID34527973
PMCPMC8356112
OpenAlexW3166903857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.