Article in STAR protocols, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Erik ToraasonInstitute of Molecular Biology, Department of Biology, University of Oregon, 1229 Franklin Boulevard, Eugene, OR 97403, USA.
Marissa GloverInstitute of Molecular Biology, Department of Biology, University of Oregon, 1229 Franklin Boulevard, Eugene, OR 97403, USA.
Anna HoracekInstitute of Molecular Biology, Department of Biology, University of Oregon, 1229 Franklin Boulevard, Eugene, OR 97403, USA.
Diana E LibudaInstitute of Molecular Biology, Department of Biology, University of Oregon, 1229 Franklin Boulevard, Eugene, OR 97403, USA.
Funding
Graduate Training in Genetics Administrative Supplement - Career Curriculum DevelopmentT32GM007413 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI GUILLEMIN, KAREN J · 1985 to 2022
$7.8M
Enhancing and expanding the CGC Strain CollectionP40OD010440 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Ann E. Rougvie · 2012 to 2026
$7.5M
Recombination pathway and partner choices during meiosis - Admin supplement for purchase of a High Content Imaging System.R35GM128890 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI Diana Elizabeth Libuda · 2018 to 2026
$4.0M
NICHD R25 Summer Research Program at the University of OregonR25HD070817 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI EISEN, JUDITH S · 2011 to 2021
$1.1M
Recombination pathway and partner choice during C. elegans meiosisR00HD076165 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI LIBUDA, DIANA ELIZABETH · 2015 to 2017
Accurate repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in developing germ cells is critical to promote proper chromosome segregation and to maintain genome integrity. To directly detect homolog-independent (intersister/intrachromatid) meiotic DSB repair, we exploited the genetics and germline physiology of
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Detection of homolog-independent meiotic DNA repair events in · full record | OpenQuestion