ArticleMedicine and pharmacy reports2021
Genetic testing in pediatric endocrine pathology.
Article in Medicine and pharmacy reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In genetic endocrine diseases, genetic testing is necessary for a precise diagnosis, which will provide a better knowledge of the evolution and prognosis and also indicate the adequate therapy, targeting the precise etiopathogenesis of the disease. Genetic testing in endocrinology is often based on classical cytogenetic techniques, molecular cytogenetic analysis or molecular biology techniques. Genetic testing in disorders of sex development includes the karyotype and SRY gene analysis and depending on the presence of associated clinical signs and on the observations at paraclinical examination, these tests will be followed by chromosomal array techniques and NGS sequencing. In short stature, the decision to perform a genetic test is taken depending on clinical, paraclinical and imaging signs. In case of a short stature associated with a low weight/length for gestational age, genetic testing is proposed to evaluate a Russell-Silver syndrome or if the short stature is associated with other clinical signs (e.g. intellectual disability), chromosomal analysis by microarray is proposed. If the short stature is disproportionate, it is indicated to perform a next generation sequencing (NGS) of a panel of genes involved in skeletal dysplasia. If an endocrine cause for short stature is observed at the hormonal evaluation, it is indicated to test a panel of genes involved in these pathways. In genetic obesity, depending on clinical signs associated to obesity, it will be a more targeted genetic testing. If obesity is associated with intellectual disability or other nonspecific neurological changes, a chromosomal analysis by microarray will be indicated. If monogenic obesity is suspected, NGS testing will be indicated (as genes panel or whole exome or genome analysis). Genetic testing in endocrine diseases brings an etiological diagnosis, but a favorable cost-benefit ratio derives from an adequate indication of these tests, generally proposed in expert centers for rare endocrine diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.