Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34527855›Full record

ArticleAdvanced theory and simulations2020

Accuracy and Precision of Alchemical Relative Free Energy Predictions with and without Replica-Exchange.

Shunzhou Wan, Gary Tresadern, Laura Pérez-Benito, Herman van Vlijmen, Peter V Coveney

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced theory and simulations, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Design, synthesis,Future medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Alchemical Enhanced Sampling with Optimized Phase Space Overlap.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. ACES: Optimized Alchemically Enhanced Sampling.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Shunzhou WanCentre for Computational Science, Department of Chemistry University College London London WC1H 0AJ UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7192-1999
Gary TresadernComputational Chemistry, Janssen Research & Development Janssen Pharmaceutica N. V. Turnhoutseweg 30 B-2340 Beerse Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4801-1644
Laura Pérez-BenitoComputational Chemistry, Janssen Research & Development Janssen Pharmaceutica N. V. Turnhoutseweg 30 B-2340 Beerse Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9607-9048
Herman van VlijmenComputational Chemistry, Janssen Research & Development Janssen Pharmaceutica N. V. Turnhoutseweg 30 B-2340 Beerse Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1915-3141
Peter V CoveneyCentre for Computational Science, Department of Chemistry University College London London WC1H 0AJ UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8787-7256
Janssen (Belgium) · BEUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/L016311/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A systematic and statistically robust protocol is applied for the evaluation of free energy calculations with and without replica-exchange. The protocol is based on ensemble averaging to generate accurate assessments of the uncertainties in the predictions. Comparison is made between FEP+ and TIES-free energy perturbation and thermodynamic integration with enhanced sampling-the latter with and without the so-called "enhanced sampling" based on replica-exchange protocols. Standard TIES performs best for a reference set of targets and compounds; no benefits accrue from replica-exchange methods. Evaluation of FEP+ and TIES with REST-replica-exchange with solute tempering-reveals a systematic and significant underestimation of free energy differences in FEP+, which becomes increasingly large for long duration simulations, is confirmed by extensive analysis of previous publications, and raises a number of questions pertaining to the accuracy of the predictions with the REST technique not hitherto discussed.

Indexed as

binding free energiesFEP+replica‐exchangethermodynamic integration with enhanced sampling

Identifiers

PMID34527855
PMCPMC8427472
OpenAlexW2990448843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.