ArticleHeliyon2021
Prevalence and determinants of unintended pregnancy in Ethiopia: narrative synthesis and meta-analysis.
Article in Heliyon, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Why are so many pregnancies still unintended in Ghana? A closer look at factors influencing reproductive autonomy.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Prevalence and Determinants of Unintended Pregnancies among Currently Pregnant, Ever-married Women in Rural and Urban Aligarh: A Community-based Study.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine · 2025Article
- Effect of pregnancy intention on postpartum contraceptive use in Ethiopia: a national longitudinal study using propensity score methods.Reproductive health · 2025Article
- Effect of Maternal Pregnancy Intention on Neonatal and Infant Healthcare Across the Continuum of Care in Ethiopia: A National Longitudinal Study Using Propensity Score Methods.Child: care, health and development · 2025Article
- Prevalence, determinants, and complications of adolescent pregnancy: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.AJOG global reports · 2025Review
- Prevalence and determinants of unintended pregnancy among rural reproductive age women in Ethiopia.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Spatial disparities and determinants of modern contraceptive use among reproductive age women in Ethiopia: application of multilevel spatial analysis.Frontiers in global women's health · 2025Article
- Magnitude, determinants, and adverse outcomes of unintended pregnancy among pregnant mothers in low- and middle-income countries: An umbrella review of systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of global health · 2024Review
- Article
- The prevalence of unintended pregnancy and its influence on pregnancy experience in Tabriz, Iran, 2023: a cross-sectional study.Reproductive health · 2024Article
- Machine learning to predict unintended pregnancy among reproductive-age women in Ethiopia: evidence from EDHS 2016.BMC women's health · 2024Article
- Article
- Assessment of the Trends and Factors Associated With Unintended Pregnancy Among Women of Reproductive Age: An Analysis of the Nigerian Demographic Health Survey Between 2008 to 2018.International journal of sexual health : official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health · 2024Article
- Prevalence of unintended pregnancy and associated factors among pregnant women with disabilities in Ethiopia: from the social model of disability perspective.Frontiers in global women's health · 2024Article
- The factors associated with under-five mortality in Ethiopia.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUnintended pregnancy has enormous health, social and psychological impacts. Thus, comprehensive local evidence is required to guide interventions to prevent the occurrence and consequences of unintended pregnancy. This systematic review was conducted to examine the prevalence and determinants of unintended pregnancy in Ethiopia.
methodsThe review was done following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) guideline. Electronic databases including Medline/PubMed, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Google scholar, and African journal online were searched to retrieve studies published from January 1/1990 to October 30/2020. Grey literatures were accessed from the online libraries of academic institutions in Ethiopia using the Google search engine. The qualities of the studies were assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklists. The retrieved studies were analyzed using STATA software version 13. The prevalence of unintended pregnancy was pooled using the random-effects model. The evidences on the determinants of unintended pregnancy were summarized in a narrative format. The statistical heterogeneity between studies was quantified by using the I-square values. Sub-group analysis and meta-regressions were done to identify the sources of heterogeneity among studies.
resultsA total of 250 studies were retrieved of which 25 studies with 23,030 women were included for meta-analysis. Only 24 studies scrutinized the determinants of unintended pregnancy. The overall prevalence of unintended pregnancy was 30 % (95% CI; 27-33 %) with high heterogeneity among studies (I
conclusionsThe pooled prevalence of unintended pregnancy in Ethiopia was high. Empowering women and ensuring the accessibility of quality family planning services can reduce the prevailing high prevalence of unintended pregnancy. Interventions that target rural, poor, unmarried, multiparous, less-educated, and adolescent women are also important to avert untended pregnancy in Ethiopia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.