Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34527818›Full record

ArticleTechnical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology2021

Faster and more accurate patient positioning with surface guided radiotherapy for ultra-hypofractionated prostate cancer patients.

Annika Mannerberg, Malin Kügele, Sandra Hamid, Anneli Edvardsson, Kristoffer Petersson, Adalsteinn Gunnlaugsson, Sven Å J Bäck, Silke Engelholm, Sofie Ceberg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Multiregional assessment of surface guidance for patient positioning in radiotherapy.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Use of surface tracking recordings to identify pitfalls during surface-guided radiotherapy.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Surface-guided radiotherapy improves rotational accuracy in gynecological cancer patients.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Introduction to: Surface Guided Radiotherapy (SGRT).Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2022
    Article
  18. Surface guided radiation therapy: An international survey on current clinical practice.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Annika MannerbergDepartment of Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Malin KügeleDepartment of Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Sandra HamidDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Anneli EdvardssonDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Kristoffer PeterssonDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Adalsteinn GunnlaugssonDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Sven Å J BäckDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Silke EngelholmDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Sofie CebergDepartment of Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Skåne University Hospital · SELund University · SEUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00001/9
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe aim of this study was to evaluate if surface guided radiotherapy (SGRT) can decrease patient positioning time for localized prostate cancer patients compared to the conventional 3-point localization setup method. The patient setup accuracy was also compared between the two setup methods. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 40 localized prostate cancer patients were enrolled in this study, where 20 patients were positioned with surface imaging (SI) and 20 patients were positioned with 3-point localization. The setup time was obtained from the system log files of the linear accelerator and compared between the two methods. The patient setup was verified with daily orthogonal kV images which were matched based on the implanted gold fiducial markers. Resulting setup deviations between planned and online positions were compared between SI and 3-point localization.

resultsMedian setup time was 2:50 min and 3:28 min for SI and 3-point localization, respectively (

conclusionsUsing SGRT for positioning of prostate cancer patients provided a faster and more accurate patient positioning compared to the conventional 3-point localization setup.

Indexed as

Patient positioningPatient setup timeRadiotherapy workflowSurface guided radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID34527818
PMCPMC8430426
OpenAlexW3197583592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.