Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34527802›Full record

ArticlePractical laboratory medicine2021

Optimizing oxytocin LC-MS/MS sensitivity by choosing the right column.

Mariëtte T Ackermans

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Practical laboratory medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 85% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mariëtte T AckermansEndocrine Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSensitivity is often an issue in bioanalytical LC-MS/MS applications. Commonly investigated parameters to improve it include additives to mobile phase, derivatization and sample-preparation. The nature of the column, however, is not frequently evaluated. DESIGN AND

methodsThe sensitivity is compared for 18 different reversed phase and 2 different HILIC columns using 2 different mobile phase compositions. Sensitivity was evaluated in terms of S/N for 1,5 pg oxytocin on column, using a scouting gradient.

resultsThe measured signal to noise ranged from 55 to 1473, indicating a substantial difference in sensitivity. The most sensitive columns were the Synergi Hydro RP (reversed phase) and the Atlantis HILIC (HILIC).

conclusionsThis study shows that choosing the right column contributes to the sensitivity of the method.

Indexed as

HILICLiquid chromatographyOxytocinReversed phase

Identifiers

PMID34527802
PMCPMC8430380
OpenAlexW3197104532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.