Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34527730›Full record

ArticleStem cell investigation2021

Comparison of stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous posterior teeth with varying levels of root resorption.

Meghna Bhandary, Shama Rao, Alandur Veena Shetty, Basavarajappa Mohana Kumar, Amitha Mahesh Hegde, Rachaita Chhabra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cell investigation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Meghna BhandaryDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, A. B. Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Nitte University (Deemed to be University), Mangaluru, India.
Shama RaoNitte University Centre for Stem Cell Research and Regenerative Medicine, K. S. Hegde Medical Academy, Nitte University (Deemed to be University), Mangaluru, India.
Alandur Veena ShettyNitte University Centre for Stem Cell Research and Regenerative Medicine, K. S. Hegde Medical Academy, Nitte University (Deemed to be University), Mangaluru, India.
Basavarajappa Mohana KumarNitte University Centre for Stem Cell Research and Regenerative Medicine, K. S. Hegde Medical Academy, Nitte University (Deemed to be University), Mangaluru, India.
Amitha Mahesh HegdeDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, A. B. Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Nitte University (Deemed to be University), Mangaluru, India.
Rachaita ChhabraDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, A. B. Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Nitte University (Deemed to be University), Mangaluru, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth (SHED) are regarded as an attractive cell source for tissue regeneration. However, the effect of different levels of root resorption on the characteristics of SHED remains less understood. Thus, the tooth source that is most suitable for the isolation of SHEDs needs to be determined. To compare cellular and biological characteristics of stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous posterior teeth with varying levels of root resorption.

methodsThe pulp was obtained from the deciduous posterior teeth depending on the level of root resorption, and isolated SHEDs were grouped as follows: Teeth with 0 to 1/3

resultsNo major differences were observed in terms of cellular morphology, viability, proliferation rate, colony-forming ability, cell surface markers expression, and mesenchymal lineage differentiation of SHEDs isolated from posterior teeth with 0 to 1/3

conclusionsCollectively, SHEDs (G1) and SHEDs (G2) showed comparable cellular and biological characteristics that enable their possible applications in regenerative therapies.

Indexed as

differentiationin vitro culturemarkers expressionroot resorptionStem cells from human exfoliated deciduous posterior teeth

Identifiers

PMID34527730
PMCPMC8413134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.