Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34527706›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2021

The Impact of Machine Learning on 2D/3D Registration for Image-Guided Interventions: A Systematic Review and Perspective.

Mathias Unberath, Cong Gao, Yicheng Hu, Max Judish, Russell H Taylor, Mehran Armand, Robert Grupp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. X2P-Net: Context-Aware 2D/3D Vertebra Localization.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. PolyPose: Deformable 2D/3D Registration via Polyrigid Transformations.Advances in neural information processing systems · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Uncertainty Quantification in Image-based 2D/3D Registration and Its Relationship with Accuracy.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Shape-matching-based fracture reduction aid concept exemplified on the proximal humerus-a pilot study.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Robot-Assisted Reduction of the Ankle Joint via Multi-Body 3D-2D Image Registration.IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics · 2024
    Article
  18. Autonomous Robotic Systems in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.Otolaryngologic clinics of North America · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mathias UnberathAdvanced Robotics and Computationally Augmented Environments (ARCADE) Lab, Department of Computer Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Cong GaoAdvanced Robotics and Computationally Augmented Environments (ARCADE) Lab, Department of Computer Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Yicheng HuAdvanced Robotics and Computationally Augmented Environments (ARCADE) Lab, Department of Computer Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Max JudishAdvanced Robotics and Computationally Augmented Environments (ARCADE) Lab, Department of Computer Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Russell H TaylorAdvanced Robotics and Computationally Augmented Environments (ARCADE) Lab, Department of Computer Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Mehran ArmandAdvanced Robotics and Computationally Augmented Environments (ARCADE) Lab, Department of Computer Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Robert GruppAdvanced Robotics and Computationally Augmented Environments (ARCADE) Lab, Department of Computer Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.

Funding

Image-Guided Workstation and Tools for the Treatment of Bone DefectsR01EB016703 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT FAYETTEVILLE · PI ARMAND, MEHRAN · 2013 to 2022
$3.4M
Robotic System for Spinal Decompression and Interbody FusionR01AR080315 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT FAYETTEVILLE · PI ARMAND, MEHRAN, JAIN, AMIT · 2022 to 2025
$1.7M
Robot-Assisted Femoroplasty with Intraoperative Biomechanical FeedbackR01EB023939 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ARMAND, MEHRAN · 2017 to 2020
$1.6M
Task-aware and Autonomous Robotic C-arm Servoing for Flouroscopy-guided InterventionsR21EB028505 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI UNBERATH, MATHIAS · 2020 to 2022
$629k
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR080315NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB016703NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB023939NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB028505
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Image-based navigation is widely considered the next frontier of minimally invasive surgery. It is believed that image-based navigation will increase the access to reproducible, safe, and high-precision surgery as it may then be performed at acceptable costs and effort. This is because image-based techniques avoid the need of specialized equipment and seamlessly integrate with contemporary workflows. Furthermore, it is expected that image-based navigation techniques will play a major role in enabling mixed reality environments, as well as autonomous and robot-assisted workflows. A critical component of image guidance is 2D/3D registration, a technique to estimate the spatial relationships between 3D structures, e.g., preoperative volumetric imagery or models of surgical instruments, and 2D images thereof, such as intraoperative X-ray fluoroscopy or endoscopy. While image-based 2D/3D registration is a mature technique, its transition from the bench to the bedside has been restrained by well-known challenges, including brittleness with respect to optimization objective, hyperparameter selection, and initialization, difficulties in dealing with inconsistencies or multiple objects, and limited single-view performance. One reason these challenges persist today is that analytical solutions are likely inadequate considering the complexity, variability, and high-dimensionality of generic 2D/3D registration problems. The recent advent of machine learning-based approaches to imaging problems that, rather than specifying the desired functional mapping, approximate it using highly expressive parametric models holds promise for solving some of the notorious challenges in 2D/3D registration. In this manuscript, we review the impact of machine learning on 2D/3D registration to systematically summarize the recent advances made by introduction of this novel technology. Grounded in these insights, we then offer our perspective on the most pressing needs, significant open problems, and possible next steps.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceaugmented realitycomputer-assisted interventionsdeep learningimage registrationrobotic surgerysurgical data science

Identifiers

PMID34527706
PMCPMC8436154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.