Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34527661›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2021

From Biogas and Hydrogen to Microbial Protein Through Co-Cultivation of Methane and Hydrogen Oxidizing Bacteria.

Frederiek-Maarten Kerckhof, Myrsini Sakarika, Marie Van Giel, Maarten Muys, Pieter Vermeir, Jo De Vrieze, Siegfried E Vlaeminck, Korneel Rabaey, Nico Boon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Frederiek-Maarten KerckhofCenter for Microbial Ecology and Technology, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium.
Myrsini SakarikaCenter for Microbial Ecology and Technology, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium.
Marie Van GielCenter for Microbial Ecology and Technology, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium.
Maarten MuysResearch Group of Sustainable Energy, Air and Water Technology, Department of Bioscience Engineering, University of Antwerp, Antwerpen, Belgium.
Pieter VermeirLaboratory of Chemical Analysis, Department of Green Chemistry and Technology, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Jo De VriezeCenter for Microbial Ecology and Technology, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium.
Siegfried E VlaeminckCenter for Advanced Process Technology for Urban Resource Recovery (CAPTURE), Gent, Belgium.
Korneel RabaeyCenter for Microbial Ecology and Technology, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium.
Nico BoonCenter for Microbial Ecology and Technology, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium.
Centre for Advanced Process Technology for Urban Resource Recovery · BEGhent University · BEUniversity of Antwerp · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasing efforts are directed towards the development of sustainable alternative protein sources among which microbial protein (MP) is one of the most promising. Especially when waste streams are used as substrates, the case for MP could become environmentally favorable. The risks of using organic waste streams for MP production-the presence of pathogens or toxicants-can be mitigated by their anaerobic digestion and subsequent aerobic assimilation of the (filter-sterilized) biogas. Even though methane and hydrogen oxidizing bacteria (MOB and HOB) have been intensively studied for MP production, the potential benefits of their co-cultivation remain elusive. Here, we isolated a diverse group of novel HOB (that were capable of autotrophic metabolism), and co-cultured them with a defined set of MOB, which could be grown on a mixture of biogas and H

Indexed as

hydrogenotrophhydrogen oxidizing bacteriamethanotroph communitiesprotein qualitysingle-cell protein (SCP)sustainable proteinsynthetic community

Identifiers

PMID34527661
PMCPMC8435580
OpenAlexW3196337323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.