ReviewCardiovascular diagnosis and therapy2021
Altitude exposure in pediatric pulmonary hypertension-are we ready for (flight) recommendations?
Review in Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- EACTS Expert Consensus Document on Civil Aviation Following Cardiothoracic Surgery and Transcatheter Procedures.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2026Review
- Mountains and Waves: Fontan Circulation in Different Environmental Conditions.Pediatric cardiology · 2025Review
- Comprehensive transcriptome analysis reveals MSTRG.19853.1/ssc-miR-361-3p/NPPA axis is related to hypoxic adaptation in Tibetan pigs.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Review
- Fitness to fly for children and adolescents after Fontan palliation.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Pediatric pulmonary hypertension.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with congenital heart disease are surviving further into adulthood and want to participate in multiple activities. This includes exposure to high altitude by air travel or recreational activities, such as hiking and skiing. However, at an altitude of about 2,500 m, the barometric environmental pressure is reduced and the partial pressure of inspired oxygen drops from 21% to 15% (hypobaric hypoxia). In physiologic response to high-altitude-related hypoxia, pulmonary vasoconstriction is induced within minutes of exposure followed by compensatory hyperventilation and increased cardiac output. Even in healthy children and adults, desaturation can be profound and lead to a significant rise in pulmonary pressure and resistance. Individuals with already increased pulmonary pressure may be placed at risk during high-altitude exposure, as compensatory mechanisms may be limited. Little is known about the physiological response and risk of developing clinically relevant events on altitude exposure in pediatric pulmonary hypertension (PAH). Current guidelines are, in the absence of clinical studies, mainly based on expert opinion. Today, healthcare professionals are increasingly faced with the question, how best to assess and advise on the safety of individuals with PAH planning air travel or an excursion to mountain areas. To fill the gap, this article summarises the current clinical knowledge on moderate to high altitude exposure in patients with different forms of pediatric PAH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.