Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34527536›Full record

ReviewCardiovascular diagnosis and therapy2021

Cardiac catheterization in pediatric pulmonary hypertension: a systematic and practical approach.

Michael Kaestner, Christian Apitz, Astrid Elisabeth Lammers

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Pediatric pulmonary hypertension.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michael KaestnerUniversity Children's Hospital Ulm, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Ulm, Germany.
Christian ApitzUniversity Children's Hospital Ulm, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Ulm, Germany.
Astrid Elisabeth LammersUniversity Children's Hospital Münster, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Münster, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significant progress in the understanding of the etiology, epidemiology, pathobiology and prognosis of pulmonary hypertension (PH) has been made over the last years. Especially in the pediatric patient population the etiology of PH is very heterogeneous. Nevertheless, the most recent change of the definition of PH to a mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) >20 mmHg has been accepted by pediatricians for uniformity and concordance with adult physicians. Based on the diverse underlying medical conditions leading to PH, a comprehensive and systematic approach for diagnosis and treatment is mandatory. Cardiac catheterization remains the gold standard for invasive assessment and acute vasoreactivity testing (AVT) additionally providing detailed information about nature of PH. In most patients repeat cardiac catheterization may be helpful for evaluation of response to targeted PH treatment, risk stratification and indication for lung transplantation. However, the information and results taken from cardiac catheterization should be interpreted by experienced investigators only who are familiar with confounding factors that may influence the results. Here we provide an overview of current recommendations for invasive hemodynamic evaluation in pediatric PH. We point out different patient scenarios and provide a structured approach for AVT and response interpretation.

Indexed as

Cardiac catheterizationchildrenpulmonary hypertension (PH)vasoreactivity

Identifiers

PMID34527536
PMCPMC8410505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.