Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34527506›Full record

ArticleIEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions2021

Training Convolutional Networks for Prostate Segmentation With Limited Data.

Sara L Saunders, Ethan Leng, Benjamin Spilseth, Neil Wasserman, Gregory J Metzger, Patrick J Bolan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sara L SaundersBiomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6961-3073
Ethan LengBiomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Benjamin SpilsethDepartment of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Neil WassermanDepartment of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Gregory J MetzgerDepartment of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3187-6529
Patrick J BolanDepartment of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4194-3975

Funding

TRD4 - Ultrahigh Field Engineering and SafetyP41EB027061 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Gregory John Metzger, KAMIL UGURBIL · 2019 to 2026
$11.7M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB027061
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multi-zonal segmentation is a critical component of computer-aided diagnostic systems for detecting and staging prostate cancer. Previously, convolutional neural networks such as the U-Net have been used to produce fully automatic multi-zonal prostate segmentation on magnetic resonance images (MRIs) with performance comparable to human experts, but these often require large amounts of manually segmented training data to produce acceptable results. For institutions that have limited amounts of labeled MRI exams, it is not clear how much data is needed to train a segmentation model, and which training strategy should be used to maximize the value of the available data. This work compares how the strategies of transfer learning and aggregated training using publicly available external data can improve segmentation performance on internal, site-specific prostate MR images, and evaluates how the performance varies with the amount of internal data used for training. Cross training experiments were performed to show that differences between internal and external data were impactful. Using a standard U-Net architecture, optimizations were performed to select between 2D and 3D variants, and to determine the depth of fine-tuning required for optimal transfer learning. With the optimized architecture, the performance of transfer learning and aggregated training were compared for a range of 5-40 internal datasets. The results show that both strategies consistently improve performance and produced segmentation results that are comparable to that of human experts with approximately 20 site-specific MRI datasets. These findings can help guide the development of site-specific prostate segmentation models for both clinical and research applications.

Indexed as

3D U-NetAutomatic prostate segmentationconvolutional neural networksmagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID34527506
PMCPMC8438764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.