ArticleCureus2021
A Case Report on Premature Twins: Primary Congenital Glaucoma or Large Cupping Disks Mimicking Primary Congenital Glaucoma?
Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE OF PREMATURE NEWBORNS - A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW WITH META-ANALYSIS.Acta clinica Croatica · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Large cupping of the optic disk in a baby or a child can be indicative of primary congenital glaucoma. Primary congenital glaucoma is often refractory to treatment, and lifelong management and follow-up are necessary; therefore, diagnosis requires careful consideration. In this study, we describe the case of twins in whom primary congenital glaucoma was initially suspected due to large cupping of the optic disks. Twin babies (a boy and a girl weighing 455 g and 592 g respectively), born prematurely (at 28 gestational weeks), were referred to our hospital eight months after birth because large cupping of the optic disks was detected during follow-up for retinopathy of prematurity. According to color fundus photographs, the cup/disk ratios in both eyes of both babies ranged from 0.75 to 0.86. However, the axial length ranged from 18.57 to 19.91 mm, the anterior chamber depth ranged from 2.68 to 2.93 mm, and the horizontal diameters of the corneas, which were clear, ranged from 10 to 10.5 mm. The intraocular pressures (IOPs), as measured by a rebound tonometer, were 15.3-19.7 mmHg. Glaucoma was strongly suspected due to the large cupping of the optics disks; however, other ocular biometric tests demonstrated that the eyes were normal. After eight months of follow-up without any medication or intervention, the IOPs stabilized between 6-22.1 mmHg, the refractive errors were between -2.5 and 0 diopters, and we found no apparent enlargement of the optic disks. In addition, we investigated both parents' optic disks to evaluate the genetic factors and found that they had relatively large C/D ratios (0.68-0.79). These premature twins exhibited glaucoma-like optic disks with large cupping, but no solid glaucomatous changes were observed with ocular biometry and IOP testing. We concluded, therefore, that the early birth and lower birth weights may have been associated with the large cupping of the patients' optic disks. To differentiate between normal physiological cupping and primary congenital glaucoma, ocular morphological examination of the eye, IOP measurements, and investigation of the parents' optic disks were useful.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.