Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34527478›Full record

ArticleCureus2021

Virtual Reality vs. High-Fidelity Mannequin-Based Simulation: A Pilot Randomized Trial Evaluating Learner Performance.

Maher M Abulfaraj, Justin M Jeffers, Sean Tackett, Todd Chang

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06956833 (Self-Guided Versus Facilitator-Guided Debriefing in Immersive Virtual Reality Simulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06956833 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Self-Guided Versus Facilitator-Guided Debriefing in Immersive Virtual Reality Simulation: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Non-Inferiority Trial As-sessing Teamwork Skills in Medical Students

TypeinterventionalSponsorRigshospitalet, DenmarkRan2025 to 2025Enrolled88ConditionsVirtual Reality Simulation, Simulation-based Medical Education, Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Immersive Virtual RealityArmsÌmmersive virtual reality simulation with self-guided debriefing, Ìmmersive virtual reality simulation with facilitator-guided debriefing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maher M AbulfarajPediatric Emergency Medicine, Taibah University School of Medicine, Madinah, SAU.
Justin M JeffersPediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Sean TackettBiostatistics, Epidemiology, and Data Management Core, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Baltimore, USA.
Todd ChangEmergency Medicine, Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Virtual Reality (VR) simulation has been found to be useful in learning technical and non-technical skills. However, empirical data about its efficacy in clinical education are limited. This pilot study compares the efficacy of VR to mannequin-based simulation for learners managing status epilepticus (SE). Methods Pediatric and emergency medicine interns at an academic tertiary care referral center were randomized to either VR (intervention, using an Oculus Rift

Indexed as

learner performancepediatric emergency medicinesimulationvirtual realityvirtual reality simulation vs. mannequin simulation

Identifiers

PMID34527478
PMCPMC8432415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.