Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34527366›Full record

ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2021

An overview of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in the intensive care unit.

Margaret Wei, Elliot Ho, Pravachan Hegde

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. The aerator: novel innovation of a gastrostomy/jejunostomy tube for tackling persistent peristomal leak.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. [Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy: Insertion and Management].The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. The Effects ofPatient preference and adherence · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Margaret WeiDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Elliot HoDivision of Advanced Interventional Thoracic Endoscopy/Interventional Pulmonology, University of California San Francisco - Fresno, Fresno, CA, USA.
Pravachan HegdeDivision of Advanced Interventional Thoracic Endoscopy/Interventional Pulmonology, University of California San Francisco - Fresno, Fresno, CA, USA.
University of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Critically ill patients are at increased risk for malnutrition as they often have underlying acute and chronic illness, stress related catabolism, decreased appetite, trauma and ongoing inflammation. Malnutrition is recognized as a leading cause of adverse outcomes, higher mortality, and increased hospital costs. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes provide a safe and effective route to provide supplemental enteral nutrition to these patients. PEG placement has essentially replaced surgical gastrostomy as the modality of choice for longer term feeding in patients. This is a highly prevalent procedure with 160,000 to 200,000 PEG procedures performed each year in the United States. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of current knowledge and practice standards with regards to placement of PEG tube in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). When a patient is considered for a PEG tube, it is important to evaluate the treatment alternatives and identify the best option for each patient. In this review, we provide the advantages and disadvantages of various feeding modalities and devices. We review the indications and contraindications for PEG tube placement as well as the risks of this procedure. We then describe in detail the per-oral pull, per-oral push, and direct percutaneous techniques for PEG tube placement. Additionally, we review the feasibility of having interventional pulmonologists place PEG tubes in the ICU.

Indexed as

Intensive Care Unit (ICU)interventional pulmonologyPercutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement

Identifiers

PMID34527366
PMCPMC8411178
OpenAlexW3033620729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.