Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34527311›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2021

Use quantitative parameters in spectral computed tomography for the differential diagnosis of metastatic mediastinal lymph nodes in lung cancer patients.

Suidan Huang, Hongjia Meng, Renli Cen, Zhiwen Ni, Xiaoling Li, Sushant Suwal, Huai Chen

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Suidan HuangDepartment of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Hongjia MengDepartment of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Renli CenDepartment of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhiwen NiDepartment of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaoling LiDepartment of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Sushant SuwalDepartment of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Huai ChenDepartment of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University · CNGuangzhou Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate diagnosis of mediastinal lymph node (LN) metastases is very important for the treatment and prognosis in lung cancer patients. Spectral computed tomography (CT), as a non-invasive approach, has good prospects for detecting mediastinal nodal metastasis. However, the diagnostic criteria of differentiating metastatic and nonmetastatic LNs have not been determined.

methodsClinical and imaging data of 64 lung cancer patients (mean age 61.3±10.3 years, 41 men) from April to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The unenhanced scan and contrast enhanced arterial phase (AP) and venous phase (VP) spectral CT scans were performed. The 70 keV monochromatic image and iodine-based image in all phases were analyzed to measure the parameters of LNs. LNs were divided into the metastatic and non-metastatic groups based on confirmative pathological results, and their differences were statistically analyzed. The receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC) was used to evaluate the efficacy of the differential diagnosis.

resultsSeventy-four metastatic LNs and 152 non-metastatic LNs were obtained. Compared with non-metastatic LNs, metastatic LNs often had a larger size (P<0.001). In the unenhanced scans, the density of metastatic LNs was lower than that of non-metastatic LNs (P<0.001); however, there was no difference in CT value in AP and VP between metastatic and non-metastatic LNs (P=0.07, P=0.08, respectively). A statistically significant difference was found in iodine concentration (IC), normalized iodine concentration (NIC) and slope of the spectral curve (λHU) in unenhanced scan, IC and λHU in AP, as well as IC, NIC and λHU in VP between metastatic and non-metastatic LNs. There was no difference in NIC in AP between them.

conclusionsCombined with morphology, spectral CT quantitative parameters demonstrate certain diagnostic efficiency for differential diagnosis between metastatic and non-metastatic LNs in lung cancer patients.

Indexed as

lung cancerLymph node metastasisspectral computed tomography (spectral CT)

Identifiers

PMID34527311
PMCPMC8411177
OpenAlexW3177997148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.