Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34527284›Full record

ArticleVirus evolution2021

Adaptation of the endemic coronaviruses HCoV-OC43 and HCoV-229E to the human host.

Diego Forni, Rachele Cagliani, Federica Arrigoni, Martino Benvenuti, Alessandra Mozzi, Uberto Pozzoli, Mario Clerici, Luca De Gioia, Manuela Sironi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Virus evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Corona- and Paramyxoviruses in Bats from Brazil: A Matter of Concern?Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Contribution to pathogenesis of accessory proteins of deadly human coronaviruses.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Diego ForniScientific Institute IRCCS E. MEDEA, Bioinformatics, via don Luigi Monza, 23843 Bosisio Parini, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0670-7106
Rachele CaglianiScientific Institute IRCCS E. MEDEA, Bioinformatics, via don Luigi Monza, 23843 Bosisio Parini, Italy.
Federica ArrigoniDepartment of Biotechnology and Biosciences, University of Milan-Bicocca, Piazza della Scienza, Milan 20126, Italy.
Martino BenvenutiDepartment of Biotechnology and Biosciences, University of Milan-Bicocca, Piazza della Scienza, Milan 20126, Italy.
Alessandra MozziScientific Institute IRCCS E. MEDEA, Bioinformatics, via don Luigi Monza, 23843 Bosisio Parini, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3911-1042
Uberto PozzoliScientific Institute IRCCS E. MEDEA, Bioinformatics, via don Luigi Monza, 23843 Bosisio Parini, Italy.
Mario ClericiDepartment of Physiopathology and Transplantation, University of Milan, via Francesco Sforza, Milan 20122, Italy.
Luca De GioiaDepartment of Biotechnology and Biosciences, University of Milan-Bicocca, Piazza della Scienza, Milan 20126, Italy.
Manuela SironiScientific Institute IRCCS E. MEDEA, Bioinformatics, via don Luigi Monza, 23843 Bosisio Parini, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Four coronaviruses (HCoV-OC43, HCoV-HKU1, HCoV-NL63, and HCoV-229E) are endemic in human populations. All these viruses are seasonal and generate short-term immunity. Like the highly pathogenic coronaviruses, the endemic coronaviruses have zoonotic origins. Thus, understanding the evolutionary dynamics of these human viruses might provide insight into the future trajectories of SARS-CoV-2 evolution. Because the zoonotic sources of HCoV-OC43 and HCoV-229E are known, we applied a population genetics-phylogenetic approach to investigate which selective events accompanied the divergence of these viruses from the animal ones. Results indicated that positive selection drove the evolution of some accessory proteins, as well as of the membrane proteins. However, the spike proteins of both viruses and the hemagglutinin-esterase (HE) of HCoV-OC43 represented the major selection targets. Specifically, for both viruses, most positively selected sites map to the receptor-binding domains (RBDs) and are polymorphic. Molecular dating for the HCoV-229E spike protein indicated that RBD Classes I, II, III, and IV emerged 3-9 years apart. However, since the appearance of Class V (with much higher binding affinity), around 25 years ago, limited genetic diversity accumulated in the RBD. These different time intervals are not fully consistent with the hypothesis that HCoV-229E spike evolution was driven by antigenic drift. An alternative, not mutually exclusive possibility is that strains with higher affinity for the cellular receptor have out-competed strains with lower affinity. The evolution of the HCoV-OC43 spike protein was also suggested to undergo antigenic drift. However, we also found abundant signals of positive selection in HE. Whereas such signals might result from antigenic drift, as well, previous data showing co-evolution of the spike protein with HE suggest that optimization for human cell infection also drove the evolution of this virus. These data provide insight into the possible trajectories of SARS-CoV-2 evolution, especially in case the virus should become endemic.

Indexed as

antigenic driftendemic coronavirusmolecular datingmolecular evolutionpositive selectionreceptor binding

Identifiers

PMID34527284
PMCPMC8344746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.