ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2021
Another lost tribe: Quantifying the experience of international medical graduates applying for a national training number (NTN) in the United Kingdom with a cross-sectional study.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fair access to higher surgical training in the UK: an equity, diversity and inclusion analysis of national selection in 2024.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Improving international medical graduates' understanding of the UK appraisal system: an interventional study.Future healthcare journal · 2023Article
- Recruitment of medical graduates from Prague to foundation programme jobs in a UK hospital: results of a 6-year project.Future healthcare journal · 2023Article
- Another lost tribe: Quantifying the experience of international medical graduates applying for a national training number (NTN) in the United Kingdom with a cross-sectional study.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInternational medical graduates (IMGs) have a primary medical qualification obtained from outside their country of practice. In the United Kingdom (UK), postgraduate medical training after foundation years involves obtaining a national training number (NTN) in their specialty of choice by national selection. In this paper, we aim to quantify how IMGs feel to obtain an NTN and what unique obstacles they may face in doing so. MATERIALS AND
methodsA survey with a combination of closed and open-ended questions was circulated to IMGs via social media and text message. The survey was aimed at those IMGs practising at a middle grade (non-consultant) level, whether they had obtained a training number or not. Data collected included demographics, years of postgraduate experience before UK arrival, number of attempts at obtaining a training number, and the most significant perceived difficulty to obtaining a training number. We also asked whether difficulties in obtaining a training number would cause IMGs to contemplate changing specialty. Data from the survey responses were analysed using SPSS 22.
resultsOut of a total of 203 doctors approached, 197 responded, of which the majority were male. All responders had at least five years of postgraduate experience before relocating to the UK. Only 56 (28.8%) had a training number at the time of the survey. Almost all the responders had made at least one unsuccessful attempt to obtain a training number. In addition, 152 (76.6%) of responders felt that timely career progression in the UK was unlikely without having a training number. 57 (29.6%) of responders considered changing specialty due to inability to obtain a training number.
conclusionObtaining an NTN remains a crucial goal among IMGs in the UK, despite the obstacles and repeated failures in doing so.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.