Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34527224›Full record

ArticleJournal of nutritional science2021

Estimates of fluid intake, urine output and hydration-levels in women from Somaliland: a cross-sectional study.

Espen Heen, Amal A Yassin, Ahmed A Madar, Maria Romøren

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nutritional science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Espen HeenDepartment of Community Medicine and Global Health, University of Oslo. P.O. box 1130, Blindern, 0318Oslo, Norway.
Amal A YassinDepartment of Women's Health, Manhal hospital, Hargeisa, Somaliland.
Ahmed A MadarDepartment of Community Medicine and Global Health, University of Oslo. P.O. box 1130, Blindern, 0318Oslo, Norway.
Maria RomørenDepartment of Community Medicine and Global Health, University of Oslo. P.O. box 1130, Blindern, 0318Oslo, Norway.
University of Oslo · NOUniversity of Hargeisa · SO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study objective was to measure fluid intake and associations with background characteristics and hydration biomarkers in healthy, free-living, non-pregnant women aged 15-69 years from Hargeisa city. We also wanted to estimate the proportion of euhydrated participants and corresponding biomarker cut-off values. Data from 136 women, collected through diaries and questionnaires, 24h urine samples and anthropometric measurements, were obtained with a cross-sectional, purposeful sampling from fifty-two school and health clusters, representing approximately 2250 women. The mean (95 % CI) 24 h total fluid intake (TFI) for all women was 2⋅04 (1⋅88, 2⋅20) litres. In multivariate regression with weight, age, parity and a chronic health problem, only weight remained a predictor (

Indexed as

DehydrationDrinkingAdolescentAdultAgedBiomarkersCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedOsmolar ConcentrationSomaliaWater-Electrolyte BalanceYoung AdultBiomarkers24-h urine volumeBeveragesBFQ, beverage frequency questionnaireDehydrationMCH, mother–child health clinicsPWI, plain water intakeSomalilandTFI, total fluid intakeTotal fluid intakeTWI, total water intakeUcol, urine colourUosm, urine osmolalityUrine colourUsg, urine specific gravityUvol, urine volumeWomen

Identifiers

PMID34527224
PMCPMC8411265
OpenAlexW3194463779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.