Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34526881›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in systems neuroscience2021

Neuronal Avalanches Across the Rat Somatosensory Barrel Cortex and the Effect of Single Whisker Stimulation.

Benedetta Mariani, Giorgio Nicoletti, Marta Bisio, Marta Maschietto, Roberto Oboe, Alessandro Leparulo, Samir Suweis, Stefano Vassanelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Anxiety and depression: A top-down, bottom-up model of circuit function.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Theoretical foundations of studying criticality in the brain.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2022
    Review
  14. Addressing skepticism of the critical brain hypothesis.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Benedetta MarianiLaboratory of Interdisciplinary Physics, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Giorgio NicolettiLaboratory of Interdisciplinary Physics, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Marta BisioPadova Neuroscience Center, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Marta MaschiettoDepartment of Biomedical Science, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Roberto OboeDepartment of Management and Engineering, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Alessandro LeparuloDepartment of Biomedical Science, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Samir SuweisLaboratory of Interdisciplinary Physics, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Stefano VassanelliPadova Neuroscience Center, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since its first experimental signatures, the so called "critical brain hypothesis" has been extensively studied. Yet, its actual foundations remain elusive. According to a widely accepted teleological reasoning, the brain would be poised to a critical state to optimize the mapping of the noisy and ever changing real-world inputs, thus suggesting that primary sensory cortical areas should be critical. We investigated whether a single barrel column of the somatosensory cortex of the anesthetized rat displays a critical behavior. Neuronal avalanches were recorded across all cortical layers in terms of both multi-unit activities and population local field potentials, and their behavior during spontaneous activity compared to the one evoked by a controlled single whisker deflection. By applying a maximum likelihood statistical method based on timeseries undersampling to fit the avalanches distributions, we show that neuronal avalanches are power law distributed for both multi-unit activities and local field potentials during spontaneous activity, with exponents that are spread along a scaling line. Instead, after the tactile stimulus, activity switches to a transient across-layers synchronization mode that appears to dominate the cortical representation of the single sensory input.

Indexed as

avalanchesbrain criticalityevoked potentiallocal field potential (LFP)multi-unit activitiessensory codingsomatotopy

Identifiers

PMID34526881
PMCPMC8435673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.