Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34526877›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2021

Dissociation of Connectivity for Syntactic Irregularity and Perceptual Ambiguity in Musical Chord Stimuli.

Chan Hee Kim, Seung-Hyun Jin, June Sic Kim, Youn Kim, Suk Won Yi, Chun Kee Chung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chan Hee KimInterdisciplinary Program in Neuroscience, College of Natural Science, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.
Seung-Hyun JinDepartment of Neurosurgery, MEG Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
June Sic KimDepartment of Neurosurgery, MEG Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Youn KimDepartment of Music, School of Humanities, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR China.
Suk Won YiCollege of Music, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.
Chun Kee ChungInterdisciplinary Program in Neuroscience, College of Natural Science, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Musical syntax has been studied mainly in terms of "syntactic irregularity" in harmonic/melodic sequences. However, "perceptual ambiguity" referring to the uncertainty of judgment/classification of presented stimuli can in addition be involved in our musical stimuli using three different chord sequences. The present study addresses how "syntactic irregularity" and "perceptual ambiguity" on musical syntax are dissociated, in terms of effective connectivity between the bilateral inferior frontal gyrus (IFGs) and superior temporal gyrus (STGs) by linearized time-delayed mutual information (LTDMI). Three conditions were of five-chord sequences with endings of dominant to tonic, dominant to submediant, and dominant to supertonic. The dominant to supertonic is most irregular, compared with the regular dominant to tonic. The dominant to submediant of the less irregular condition is the most ambiguous condition. In the LTDMI results, connectivity from the right to the left IFG (IFG-LTDMI) was enhanced for the most irregular condition, whereas that from the right to the left STG (STG-LTDMI) was enhanced for the most ambiguous condition (

Indexed as

effective connectivityinferior frontal gyruslinearized time-delayed mutual informationmagnetoencephalographyperceptual ambiguitysuperior temporal gyrussyntactic irregularity

Identifiers

PMID34526877
PMCPMC8435864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.