Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34526860›Full record

ReviewSeminars in plastic surgery2021

Wound Healing: A Comprehensive Review.

Yasser H Almadani, Joshua Vorstenbosch, Peter G Davison, Amanda M Murphy

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in plastic surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 140 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
140citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
13.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

140 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 242 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Toxins turned into medicines: A systematic review of peptide animal-derived venom in wound treatments.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Multi-hierarchical biofunctional polymeric biomaterial to promote wound closure.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2026
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Molecular and Pharmacokinetic Rationale for the Use ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

80 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yasser H AlmadaniDivision of Plastic Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Joshua VorstenboschDivision of Plastic Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Peter G DavisonDivision of Plastic Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Amanda M MurphyDivision of Plastic Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
McGill University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wound healing is an intricate, tightly regulated process that is critical to maintaining the barrier function of skin along with preserving all other skin functions. This process can be influenced by a variety of modifiable and nonmodifiable factors. As wound healing takes place in all parts of the human body, this review focuses on cutaneous wound healing and highlights the classical wound healing phases. Alterations in any of these phases can promote chronic wound development and may impede wound healing.

Indexed as

chronic woundsinflammationwound healing

Identifiers

PMID34526860
PMCPMC8432991
OpenAlexW3184816240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.