ArticleNoro psikiyatri arsivi2021
Study of Validity and Reliability of the Reinforcement Sensitivity Questionnaire in Turkish Community Sample.
Article in Noro psikiyatri arsivi, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIn this study, it is aimed to assess the validity and reliability of Reinforcement Sensitivity Questionnaire (RSQ) which was developed on the basis of revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (rRST) in Turkish community sample.
methodsThe sample of study was consisted of 528 participants, 314 (59.5%) female and 214 (40.5%) male, in the range of 18-69 years. Data was collected by using online data collection tools via snowball method. Within the scope of the reliability study, test-retest application, split-half method and internal consistency analysis; within the scope of the validity study, explanatory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were performed. For criterion-related validity Behavioral Inhibition System / Behavioral Activation System Scale (BIS/BAS), Eysenck Personality Questionnaire Revised-Abbreviated Form (EPQR-A) and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-II) were applied.
resultsAt the result of reliability analysis, the Cronbach Alpha internal consistency coefficient values of RSQ subscales were determined between 0.71 and 0.82. At the result of criterion-related validity, statistically significant correlations between subscales of RSQ and the similar subscales of BIS/BAS, EPQR-A and STAI-II were found. In explanatory factor analysis, a five-factor construct that has eigenvalues above 1, accounting for 49.96% of the total variance was found and it was seen that the questionnaire items loaded on their expected subscales consistent with the original questionnaire. In confirmatory factor analysis, CFI value was below the acceptable value of 0.90 at the first analysis. After eliminating two items and applying the recommended modifications, the fit indices reached the acceptable levels.
conclusionAccording to the results of analysis, it was determined that Turkish version of RSQ is a valid and reliable evaluation tool for Turkish population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.