ArticleCancer management and research2021
Explore the Value of Adding Induction Chemotherapy to Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in T3-4N0M0 Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Cancer management and research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Nomogram to Identify the Optimal Candidates for Induction Chemotherapy in Advanced N-Stage Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.Cancer management and research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePatients with T3-4N0M0 nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) are a unique subgroup of locoregional advanced NPC, which generally have a better prognosis than others and are often excluded in most randomized controlled clinical trials focusing on locoregional advanced NPC. The management of this population is still controversial. This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of T3-4N0M0 NPC patients treated with sequential induction chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy (IC+CCRT) or chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) alone. PATIENTS AND
methodsWe included 362 patients diagnosed with T3-4N0M0 NPC from two hospitals between December 2005 and December 2014. All patients were received IC + CCRT (n=146) or CCRT (n=216). Locoregional failure-free survival (LRFFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were retrospectively estimated.
resultsThe median follow-up was 95 (range: 11-168) months. Univariable analyses have shown that 5-year LRFFS, DFS and OS in the IC+CCRT group and the CCRT group were 87.4% vs 93.4% (P = 0.035), 80.4% vs 87.0% (P = 0.047) and 86.3% vs 93.0% (P = 0.040). Multivariate analyses demonstrated that only the T stage was the independent prognostic factor for LRFFS, DFS, and OS in the entire group analysis. Subgroup analysis revealed that patients with T3 tumors who received IC+CCRT had significantly lower LRFFS, DFS, and OS than those treated with CCRT. For T4 patients, the outcomes had no significant difference between the two groups.
conclusionThis retrospective study showed that T3N0M0 patients who received CCRT had better prognosis than those treated with IC+CCRT. In terms of T4N0M0 disease, treatment outcomes are similar in both treatment groups. However, these results require further confirmation of large sample size, prospectively, randomized controlled trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.