ArticleJournal of pain research2021
The Effectiveness of Thermal Neuromodulation Using Precise Heat in the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain Over 60 Days: An In-Home User Trial.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of Pulsing Digital Heating Devices on Skin Parameters, Subjective Pain, Mood, and Anxiety.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTwo previous independent double-blind randomized studies demonstrated that thermal neuromodulation using high temperature pulsed heat reduced pain in subjects with chronic low back pain. The present study examined the effects of high temperature pulsed heat via an experimental device in a real-world In-Home Use Trial (IHUT) over a sixty-day period. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis in-home study recruited 34 subjects with chronic low back pain, provided them with an experimental device that delivered treatment session of high temperature pulsed heat up to 45°C, and followed them for eight weeks. Subjects were allowed to use the device as needed. Primary outcome was pain rating as measured by the 11-point Numeric Pain Scale at baseline, four and eight weeks of treatment. The secondary outcome measures were the interference with daily living components of the Brief Pain Inventory at baseline versus eight weeks of treatment.
resultsThirty-two subjects completed the study. Pain levels were 5.81 at baseline, 2.79 at four weeks and 2.25 at eight weeks. All changes in pain levels between baseline and four weeks, baseline, and eight weeks and between four and eight weeks were statistically significant (p < 0.05). At eight weeks, the seven components of pain interference with activities of daily living and pain interference with walking were statistically reduced (P < 0.05). About 72% of subjects reported a single 30-minute treatment session produced over 3 hours of pain relief.
conclusionAn eight-week in-home trial of high-temperature thermal modulation devices produced significant reductions in pain and pain interference with activities of daily living, an important measure of function. Efforts were made to control and reduce study contamination. This study provides important initial data for long-term outcome studies of thermal neuromodulation using high temperature pulsed heat to treat low back pain and to improve subject function and demonstrated that individuals with chronic pain can effectively self-manage pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.