Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34526783›Full record

ReviewJournal of asthma and allergy2021

Intranasal Corticosteroids: Topical Potency, Systemic Activity and Therapeutic Index.

Peter T Daley-Yates, Désirée Larenas-Linnemann, Chaitanya Bhargave, Manish Verma

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of asthma and allergy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Soft drugs: design principles and topical applications.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Evaluating the efficacy and safety of Stapokibart (CM310) in the treatment of uncontrolled seasonal allergic rhinitis based on real-world research.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Assessment of the Effectiveness of Allergic Rhinitis Medications Using a Target Trial Emulation Approach Based on Mobile Health Data.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. [The need for an integrated approach to rhinitis and asthma]Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Medicas (Cordoba, Argentina) · 2023
    Article
  20. Pharmacology, particle deposition and drug administration techniques of intranasal corticosteroids for treating allergic rhinitis.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Peter T Daley-YatesClinical Pharmacology and Experimental Medicine, GlaxoSmithKline plc., Research and Development, Uxbridge, UK.
Désirée Larenas-LinnemannCenter of Excellence in Asthma and Allergy, Médica Sur Clinical Foundation and Hospital, México City, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-5713-5331
Chaitanya BhargaveRespiratory and Allergy, GlaxoSmithKline plc., Mumbai, India.
Manish VermaRespiratory and Allergy, GlaxoSmithKline plc., Mumbai, India.
GlaxoSmithKline (India) · INGlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) · GBHospital Médica Sur · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intranasal corticosteroid (INCS) therapy is the preferred treatment option for allergic rhinitis (AR). Although all INCSs for the treatment of AR are considered safe and effective, differences in potency, molecular structure features and physicochemical and pharmacokinetic properties could result in differences in clinical efficacy and safety. Higher glucocorticoid receptor (GR) binding affinity of INCS is associated with higher lipophilicity, nasal tissue retention and topical potency. Higher topical potency is also accompanied by low oral bioavailability and high systemic clearance conferring low systemic exposure, reduced potential for systemic adverse effects and an improved therapeutic index. It has been shown that adverse events related to systemic exposure of INCSs in children are low. Although INCSs mostly produce low systemic effects, use of an INCS with low systemic exposure in patients on multiple corticosteroid (CS) therapies could help reduce the total systemic burden of CS therapy. Despite differences in topical potency, physicochemical and pharmacokinetic properties between INCSs, clinical studies of INCSs in the treatment of AR generally show no clinically important differences between these compounds, and poor correlation between INCS topical potency and clinical response. However, the lack of head-to-head comparisons of INCSs in clinical studies conducted in more severe AR patients should be noted. This narrative review provides an assessment of the therapeutic relevance of topical potency and the physicochemical and pharmacokinetic properties of INCSs and describes for the first time the relationship between topical potency and therapeutic index using pharmacological features of INCSs. It concludes that higher GR binding affinity and topical potency can potentially improve the therapeutic index of an INCS. Therefore, both efficacy and systemic exposure profiles should be considered when comparing INCS regimens in terms of therapeutic equivalence, to aid clinical decision-making and avoid the assumption that all INCS formulations are the same when considering treatment options.

Indexed as

corticosteroidintranasalrhinitis therapeutic indextopical potency

Identifiers

PMID34526783
PMCPMC8436259
OpenAlexW3197423053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.