Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34526742›Full record

ReviewJournal of mid-life health

Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause Assessment Tools.

Eduard Mension, Inmaculada Alonso, Marta Tortajada, Isabel Matas, Sílvia Gómez, Laura Ribera, Cristina Ros, Sònia Anglès-Acedo, Camil Castelo-Branco

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of mid-life health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06508944 (Efficacy of Vaginal 17β-Estradiol on the Urinary Storage Symptoms in Postmenopausal Women), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06508944 phase4completednot on this map

Efficacy of Vaginal 17β-Estradiol on the Urinary Storage Symptoms in Postmenopausal Women: A Randomized Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorMahidol UniversityRan2024 to 2024Enrolled86ConditionsLower Urinary Tract Symptoms, Female Genitourinary Disease, Urinary Stress Incontinence, Urinary Urge IncontinenceArmsvaginal 17 beta-estradiol, Placebo, Behavioral modifications
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Eduard MensionClinic Institute/Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, Hospital Clinic, Villarroel, Barcelona, Spain.
Inmaculada AlonsoClinic Institute/Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, Hospital Clinic, Villarroel, Barcelona, Spain.
Marta TortajadaClinic Institute/Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, Hospital Clinic, Villarroel, Barcelona, Spain.
Isabel MatasClinic Institute/Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, Hospital Clinic, Villarroel, Barcelona, Spain.
Sílvia GómezClinic Institute/Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, Hospital Clinic, Villarroel, Barcelona, Spain.
Laura RiberaClinic Institute/Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, Hospital Clinic, Villarroel, Barcelona, Spain.
Cristina RosClinic Institute/Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, Hospital Clinic, Villarroel, Barcelona, Spain.
Sònia Anglès-AcedoClinic Institute/Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, Hospital Clinic, Villarroel, Barcelona, Spain.
Camil Castelo-BrancoClinic Institute/Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, Hospital Clinic, Villarroel, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New therapeutic options are being considered to treat genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM), such as vaginal laser, ospemifene, or prasterone, but there is no explicit agreement in the scientific community for its use. Some concerns have arisen on how to evaluate the improvement of GSM symptoms. In 2003, the FDA suggested possible end points for this purpose: change in severity of symptoms, change in vaginal pH, and change in vaginal maturation index (VMI). Contrarily, the most common assessment tools used to quantify severity and improvement of GSM nowadays are the visual analog scale of GSM symptoms, the vaginal health index, and the female sexual function index. In our opinion, subjective and objective variables to evaluate GSM can be differentiated, and not many of the considered objective outcomes are used in the recent literature assessing GSM. There is the possibility that some therapies present only subjective improvement, giving place to a possible placebo effect that is not being evaluated. To conclude, there is a demand to evaluate whether vaginal pH and VMI are enough to assess objectively GSM changes or new objective approaches should be audited.

Indexed as

Assessment toolsgenitourinary syndrome of menopausevaginal laservulvovaginal atrophy

Identifiers

PMID34526742
PMCPMC8409719
OpenAlexW3183357553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.