Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34526632›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Microbial community of soda Lake Van as obtained from direct and enriched water, sediment and fish samples.

Esra Ersoy Omeroglu, Mert Sudagidan, Mediha Nur Zafer Yurt, Behiye Busra Tasbasi, Elif Esma Acar, Veli Cengiz Ozalp

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Description ofPhytoKeys · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. CarotegenicBiology · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Esra Ersoy OmerogluBiology Department, Basic and Industrial Microbiology Section, Faculty of Science, Ege University, 35040, Bornova, Izmir, Turkey. esraerso@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6726-9157
Mert SudagidanKIT-ARGEM R&D Center, Konya Food and Agriculture University, 42080, Meram, Konya, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-3980-8344
Mediha Nur Zafer YurtKIT-ARGEM R&D Center, Konya Food and Agriculture University, 42080, Meram, Konya, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-3064-3811
Behiye Busra TasbasiKIT-ARGEM R&D Center, Konya Food and Agriculture University, 42080, Meram, Konya, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-2076-3756
Elif Esma AcarKIT-ARGEM R&D Center, Konya Food and Agriculture University, 42080, Meram, Konya, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-6264-7550
Veli Cengiz OzalpDepartment of Medical Biology, Medical School, Atilim University, 06830, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-7659-5990
Konya Food and Agriculture University · TRAtilim University · TREge University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soda lakes are saline and alkaline ecosystems that are considered to have existed since the first geological records of the world. These lakes support the growth of ecologically and economically important microorganisms due to their unique geochemistry. Microbiota members of lakes are valuable models to study the link between community structure and abiotic parameters such as pH and salinity. Lake Van is the largest endroheic lake and in this study, bacterial diversity of lake water, sediment, and pearl mullet (inci kefali; Alburnus tarichi), an endemic species of fish which are collected from different points of the lake, are studied directly and investigated meticulously using a metabarcoding approach after pre-enrichment. Bacterial community structures were identified using Next Generation Sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene. The analysis revealed that the samples of Lake Van contain high level of bacterial diversity. Direct water samples were dominated by Proteobacteria, Cyanobacteria, and Bacteroidota, on the other hand, pre-enriched water samples were dominated by Proteobacteria and Firmicutes at phylum-level. In direct sediment samples Proteobacteria, whereas in pre-enriched sediment samples Firmicutes and Proteobacteria were determined at highest level. Pre-enriched fish samples were dominated by Proteobacteria and Firmicutes at phylum-level. In this study, microbiota members of Lake Van were identified by taxonomic analysis.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaAnimalsBacillotaFishesGeologic SedimentsLakesProteobacteriaRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID34526632
PMCPMC8443733
OpenAlexW3200704114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.