Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34526599›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Differences and similarities in the conceptualization of COVID-19 and other diseases in the first Italian lockdown.

Claudia Mazzuca, Ilenia Falcinelli, Arthur-Henri Michalland, Luca Tummolini, Anna M Borghi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Claudia MazzucaBallaB (Body, Action, Language Lab), Department of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, and Health Studies, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy. mazzuca.claudia@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1568-2425
Ilenia Falcinelli *BallaB (Body, Action, Language Lab), Department of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, and Health Studies, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Arthur-Henri Michalland *University of Montpellier-LIFAM, Montpellier, France.
Luca TummoliniInstitute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, Italian National Research Council, Rome, Italy.
Anna M BorghiBallaB (Body, Action, Language Lab), Department of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, and Health Studies, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy. anna.borghi@gmail.com.

Funding

ERDF 182117SRHorizon 2020 Framework Programme 952324
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several studies have highlighted the flexible character of our conceptual system. However, less is known about the construction of meaning and the impact of novel concepts on the structuring of our conceptual space. We addressed these questions by collecting free listing data from Italian participants on a newly-and yet nowadays critical-introduced concept, i.e., COVID-19, during the first Italian lockdown. We also collected data for other five illness-related concepts. Our results show that COVID-19's representation is mostly couched in the emotional sphere, predominantly evoking fear-linked to both possible health-related concerns and social-emotional ones. In contrast with initial public debates we found that participants did not assimilate COVID-19 neither completely to severe illnesses (e.g., tumor) nor completely to mild illnesses (e.g., flu). Moreover, we also found that COVID-19 has shaped conceptual relations of other concepts in the illness domain, making certain features and associations more salient (e.g., flu-fear; disease-mask). Overall, our results show for the first time how a novel, real concept molds existing conceptual relations, testifying the malleability of our conceptual system.

Indexed as

Concept FormationAdultCOVID-19HumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedQuarantineStress, Psychological

Identifiers

PMID34526599
PMCPMC8443562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.